It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
I created this to make the classifieds section better .
avatar
hucklebarry: While you and TET may disagree, I feel the line is pretty clear. GOG is a gaming website. I come here to talk about games. If it isn't about games... it goes into the off topics. I don't come here to talk about religion, politics, weather, etc.

I would consider game giveaways... on topic. But I would not complain if they had their own forum as well.

I think it goes without saying that if you added a subforum, then you would also add a "view all" view to satisfy those that want to see things without filtering content.

For my part, its a business strategy. It not only provides some much needed order, but it also prevents some very offensive topics from being a first impression to potential GOG customers.
I'm not disagreeing with TET, I also feel that General is the off-topic forum. But let me give examples of "On topic or Off topic" thread, that would need categorizing.
First and foremost, the current minefield "Tropes vs Women". It is about games. It is about politics (or however you wish to call the matter). Would that be on topic or off topic?
Second discussion, the conditions of 4A when they were making Metro: Last Light. It starts as a gaming related discussion, then it evolves to working conditions. Is it on topic or off topic?
Elmofongo's latest thread, about the need for more Point and Click adventures. It's a writing piece by the author of Bioshock, who claims that more P&C adventures are needed. People think that is because he wasn't trying to make a game, he was trying to write a book. Discussion goes towards what writers are employed in the gaming industry, and why? On topic or off topic?

All 3 threads have something to do with gaming. All 3 threads are also treading on a bit "heavier" subjects, be they work conditions, holywood writers who couldn't make the cut, thus write for the gaming industry, and the many -isms.
Personally, I prefer this "organized chaos" of the forum, where the discussion begins at point A and moves wherever the flow of conversation takes it. I do understand though that people don't want to see everything, thus why I propose tags for the discussions.

On the other hand, my "Leave everything as is" is a personal preference, just like subforums are a personal preference for others. And since I'm starting to lose my train of thought, I'll stop it here and hope it makes sense...
avatar
hucklebarry: While you and TET may disagree, I feel the line is pretty clear. GOG is a gaming website. I come here to talk about games. If it isn't about games... it goes into the off topics. I don't come here to talk about religion, politics, weather, etc.

I would consider game giveaways... on topic. But I would not complain if they had their own forum as well.

I think it goes without saying that if you added a subforum, then you would also add a "view all" view to satisfy those that want to see things without filtering content.

For my part, its a business strategy. It not only provides some much needed order, but it also prevents some very offensive topics from being a first impression to potential GOG customers.
avatar
JMich: I'm not disagreeing with TET, I also feel that General is the off-topic forum. But let me give examples of "On topic or Off topic" thread, that would need categorizing.
First and foremost, the current minefield "Tropes vs Women". It is about games. It is about politics (or however you wish to call the matter). Would that be on topic or off topic?
Second discussion, the conditions of 4A when they were making Metro: Last Light. It starts as a gaming related discussion, then it evolves to working conditions. Is it on topic or off topic?
Elmofongo's latest thread, about the need for more Point and Click adventures. It's a writing piece by the author of Bioshock, who claims that more P&C adventures are needed. People think that is because he wasn't trying to make a game, he was trying to write a book. Discussion goes towards what writers are employed in the gaming industry, and why? On topic or off topic?

All 3 threads have something to do with gaming. All 3 threads are also treading on a bit "heavier" subjects, be they work conditions, holywood writers who couldn't make the cut, thus write for the gaming industry, and the many -isms.
Personally, I prefer this "organized chaos" of the forum, where the discussion begins at point A and moves wherever the flow of conversation takes it. I do understand though that people don't want to see everything, thus why I propose tags for the discussions.

On the other hand, my "Leave everything as is" is a personal preference, just like subforums are a personal preference for others. And since I'm starting to lose my train of thought, I'll stop it here and hope it makes sense...
It makes sense, but I think you also have to answer the questions you posed for using tags as well. How do you tag a thread that has two subjects? At any rate those are edge issues. My biggest concern are the flame bait topics we see quite often and the ones that start out completely off topic.

also, I may have left out a comma or something, I was saying that you and TET may disagree with me, not with each other. If the forums were organized into subforums AND there was a simple "view all" option, you would have the option to view them as you like and I would have the option to view them as I like. I prefer the win/win approach to one where half (guestimate) end up unhappy. That said, we all knew the forums were a single mass when we joined, so we can't throw too big of a tantrum ;) Still, I never picked a side until I saw how it worked, and now simply offer my feedback. This is the only un-organized forum I've been to. not a fan. There are time periods where I skip it altogether because it does become an issue to me. sometimes its the search function being useless, most of the time its skimming ridiculous and over the top off-topic thread titles on the main forums.

anyhow, just my 2 cents. I want a win/win approach and IMHO that could exist with some effort, but its an admittedly large effort on GOG's part. I'm guessing they are fine with things as is.
avatar
JMich: ...Personally, I prefer this "organized chaos" of the forum, where the discussion begins at point A and moves wherever the flow of conversation takes it. I do understand though that people don't want to see everything, thus why I propose tags for the discussions.

On the other hand, my "Leave everything as is" is a personal preference, just like subforums are a personal preference for others....
This.

My personal preference is for how it is.
avatar
hucklebarry: It makes sense, but I think you also have to answer the questions you posed for using tags as well. How do you tag a thread that has two subjects?
The same way gmail tags them. You add all relevant tags to a topic, and it appears for any of those. The "Don't Show" would be interesting though. If you wish to see Kickstarter topics, but don't want to see FPS topics, should it show a Kickstarter FPS topic or not?

avatar
hucklebarry: also, I may have left out a comma or something, I was saying that you and TET may disagree with me, not with each other.
More like a word or two it seems. No worries, this is just a discussion, as usual. But wasn't this topic about giveaway threads? :P
avatar
JMich: Personally, I prefer this "organized chaos" of the forum, where the discussion begins at point A and moves wherever the flow of conversation takes it. I do understand though that people don't want to see everything, thus why I propose tags for the discussions.
Giveaways are not discussions, though. Even Telika has been slacking off.
avatar
xyem: "We have a giveaway problem!"

.. only on GOG.

A think a big congratulations is in order for the community for this to be one of the main issues.
Easy to say, but we know what you did ... now what if WEEEEEE inflicted that punishment to YOOOOU first, huuuuH ? Come on guys, let's congratulate him to death as he deserves ! HYARHYARHYARHYARHYAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRrrrr

(And then we'll sunbathe you and give you to dirtyharry for ... not *really* a hug ...)
Post edited May 29, 2013 by Potzato
avatar
Starmaker: Giveaways are not discussions, though.
Depends on the giveaway I'd say. I tried to have a bit of discussion start on mine, though I didn't require it.
avatar
Starmaker: Even Telika has been slacking off.
Is he finally set up properly? With internet access and everything?
avatar
Starmaker: Giveaways are not discussions, though.
avatar
JMich: Depends on the giveaway I'd say. I tried to have a bit of discussion start on mine, though I didn't require it.
Ah yes, good thread.
avatar
Starmaker: Even Telika has been slacking off.
avatar
JMich: Is he finally set up properly? With internet access and everything?
I don't know, although I noticed his location change. I was recalling the good old days and his awesome giveaway threads that made me want to uprep his every post just to see more of them.
avatar
Starmaker: I don't know, although I noticed his location change. I was recalling the good old days and his awesome giveaway threads that made me want to uprep his every post just to see more of them.
Well, he did just post. Time to grill him then.
avatar
xyem: "We have a giveaway problem!"

.. only on GOG.

A think a big congratulations is in order for the community for this to be one of the main issues.
avatar
Potzato: Easy to say, but we know what you did ... now what if WEEEEEE inflicted that punishment to YOOOOU first, huuuuH ? Come on guys, let's congratulate him to death as he deserves ! HYARHYARHYARHYARHYAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRrrrr

(And then we'll sunbathe you and give you to dirtyharry for ... not *really* a hug ...)
... what?

(said out loud, at 3am).
Check this post
Hide giveaway threads (greasemonkey)
avatar
Sachys: Oh, this again - must be Wednesday.

As mentioned in every previous thread on this so far, a working compromise and improvement would be a seperate colour icon (such as that for Questions and news) for GAs, as well as the ability to filter posts and a better search function.
That would be a great idea! +1
avatar
Sachys: Oh, this again - must be Wednesday.

As mentioned in every previous thread on this so far, a working compromise and improvement would be a seperate colour icon (such as that for Questions and news) for GAs, as well as the ability to filter posts and a better search function.
avatar
ThermioN: That would be a great idea! +1
...and thatnks to Grimwerk its now (sort of) possible via greasemonkey

http://www.gog.com/forum/general/hide_giveaway_threads_greasemonkey