Sazanamistyle: awalterj, I'm referring specifically to GOG forum posters who piss and moan and whine every time a Japanese or Japanese-styled game gets released on GOG and make stupid jokes about tentacle rape and lolis, effectually basing their entire perception of Japanese gaming on a minority of the produced material. They make those threads tedious to wade through.
No, of course you don't have encyclopedic knowledge on something to comment on it, but no part of my post implied that. You do need to be able to specific how broadly or narrowly your comments apply to a given thing. If you're going to make a generalized statement about Japanese gaming, you need to be able to back it up at least somewhat or narrow it down to the issue you're familiar with. Anything less is a bad form of thinking about any issue in any manner whatsoever. That's just common sense. I'm through with people who lack it.
You talk about Yokai Watch, but you don't have the first clue about what it does that RPGs haven't done before (the roulette-based battle system, the touch-based mini-game status effects, the first person close-up searching sequences, the multi-player random hunts that literally switch the battle mechanics to a different genre, the way time travel is used, the way the game's plot is structured and so on) and just write it off as Pokemon with ghosts, which is an absurd oversimplification. Are you truly interested in learning about some of the games that are out there and talking about it? Or is this just a smokescreen for me to take my time introducing games while you respond point by point with, "That's not innovative because of this" kind of list wars thing? Because I've been there and done that and have no wish to waste my time.
After watching a sufficient number of gameplay videos of Yokai Watch I can say I have no interest in that game but that doesn't mean I'll smokescreen any other game you subsequently list, that would be unproductive. It may have happened to you before that internet curmudgeons lure you into an endless loop trap only to repeatedly bash and exhaust your well-meant recommendations and that's regretful, however I'm not that kinda person and since you can't know if I am such a person or not, you can give me the benefit of the doubt seeing as bashing your first example doesn't qualify as loop trap curmudgeonry yet.