RoloTony: If that site isn't a scam, where are they getting the funds to pay readers?
rtcvb32: Well if you go to an article that isn't funded, at the bottom where the earning would be located there's an option instead to fund it... So anyone can fund it... I guess the question is... Why? Maybe stimulate people to start reading like they used to with newspapers 50 years ago? I used to deliver newspapers and quit when i was 15... That feels like a lifetime ago... and it was too...
Perhaps articles of higher importance to get more people looking/reading certain types of content, like making people aware of a new
SOPA bill is being passed, then being paid to read up on it and be aware so you can voice your opinion seems like a reasonable option...
blotunga: Most people in my country make $200 in a month.. So not a bad choice actually...
rtcvb32: Then if it's real, might go for it... But i'd want confirmation before adding any personal information of my own. Course if they can pay via paypal, then that would be good.
Thanks for the additional information. Like you said, the biggest question is still "why" someone would fund these articles. Doesn't make sense from a financial perspective... maybe for propaganda purposes? Like if a news story is slanted towards a particular point of view, this site would help propagate that point of view...?