It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
iippo: That would be utterly personal.

Deeply religious person may recover from hard times because he/she will perhaps have support from community, has the possibility to think stuff like "its God's plan" or whatever and sort of accept whatever comes etc..

But really, its nothing magical. The person does not live longer because God gives him or her superhuman powers - rather the person gets support from extended social network and may have various guidelines to rely on.

However, one might have these same supports from hobby, work community, neighbours and so on.

But yes, i do agree that religions may have beneficial effect on people in this sense - but ofcourse there are many flipsides as well. Then again, religions are, or atleast should be rather personal matters in the first place, so everyone should use their own heads and hearts instead of following any group or say-so person to find out if they are any good or not.
I never said it's magic. I only wanted to show that there are benefits to what some people call "fairy tales" and such, without really thinking about the ramifications. People can do many stuff when just believing in them, the human psyche is something we don't understand to the fullest.

And I don't think it had anything to do with the community, it was just something with having an inner peace, or to be more specific less stress. But I'm not sure anymore, so don't take my word on that.

[url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/17/health/17faith.html]are some articles I found after doing a quick search on google. And the article I'm talking about might have been in the "Spiegel", but I'm not going to search for it now.

People (especially those who're thinking scientifically, or at least are thinking they do) should maybe consider why something that's unnecessary has been still a part of us as a species for so long. I think the biggest mistake one can make is to say "it's just shit anyway" and be done with it.
low rated
avatar
ThoRn: I don't believe males want to rape. I believe certain social and economical and even political obstructions and failures can cause a male to lose his self-control and act out savagely. This is no way condones rape but explains how and why it can happen.
avatar
Novotnus: I hope you're not trying to justify it?
Well, I'm going to be honest. I don't justify it with the way things are. And it's too difficult to answer how I'd feel if all these things were taken away and we were back to caveman times. I'm sure at first I'd hold onto my religious views against it. But such a brutal and savage world can take a toll on any man's views and they can and will change. It's very easy to sit here and say it's wrong and no I will never do it. Then again, I'm not having to live like a cavemen either and sex is given to me very often to keep my sexual appetite sated. I just had a very large hamburger and French fries for dinner. My stomach is very full and my appetite is sated. Put me someplace where I starving and I'm sure I'd be willing to eat the meat surrounding your asshole. People do what they gotta do to survive. Do I like the thought of that? HELL NO! But then again, I'm not that hungry right now. Ever seen the movie "Alive" where they each the butts of the dead? People gotta do what they gotta do to survive. It's nature. It's easy to sit in judgment when you've not had to walk in those shoes.
avatar
Cormoran: The only thing that would stop me from wanting this is the sick shit he'd do to his family and neighbours for us to find out. On the other hand he may be doing that already and simply considering it his godly duty.
avatar
ThoRn: I have to wonder about some of you atheists myself. I certainly don't believe a true Christian goes around raping and murdering anyone. But an atheist wolf dressed in Christian sheep wool might. How can you have morality without religion? Where does your morality come from? And furthermore how come your morality is so much like mine? We both agree that rape and murder is wrong. But how can that be? I choose not to rape because it's sin and I've got enough self-control to not give into that sin. I do lust however but not so much that's I'd be willing to rape and hurt a woman over it. I prefer it when the woman consents as that makes me feel loved and desired in return. I can't say I'd get any thrill out of raping a woman. Then again, I've never tried it and don't plan on it. If the world were to suddenly fall apart and become completely chaotic I don't know what I'd do or be capable of? I'd still have my religious morals at first but I'm sure brutality of such a savage environment can take a toll on anyone's views in life and force them to change. The old military saying is, "Adapt, improvise, and overcome".

Ever watch "The Walking Dead"? I think that show does a good job of showing how people can change radically in their views on certain issues and before long people learn real quick that it's kill or be killed. Rape or be raped. Eat or starve. Shelter or freeze. Is that the type of world I want? Hell no. I'm comfy with modern day living and all the willing women in short skirts that WANT sex for cheap. I do admit feminism HAS given men some nice benefits.
The Walking Dead is a TV show. One that assumes 99.99% of the population is dead or dying where people are subjected physical and psychological stresses that drove people to madness if not suicide. That is an example of society being utterly, absolutely, destroyed, without hope, without chance, without recovery. It is not an example of a world that suddenly abandoned religion.

Why do atheist have morals? Because humans long ago decided that hurting other humans is a dickish way to go about things. Oh, but religious worlds far back, for the past thousands of years have waged wars against other nations, other cultures, other religions for all of Humanity. They killed to serve their country. They killed to serve their gods and bring glory to their gods. The reason why we don't have that today is the world is more inter-reliant and we've come to accept cultural differences, including religious difference. A tribe does not destroy itself when it is surviving reasonably. That's regardless of religion or society.
Post edited January 24, 2014 by QC
avatar
Novotnus: I hope you're not trying to justify it?
avatar
ThoRn: Well, I'm going to be honest. I don't justify it with the way things are. And it's too difficult to answer how I'd feel if all these things were taken away and we were back to caveman times. I'm sure at first I'd hold onto my religious views against it. But such a brutal and savage world can take a toll on any man's views and they can and will change. It's very easy to sit here and say it's wrong and no I will never do it. Then again, I'm not having to live like a cavemen either and sex is given to me very often to keep my sexual appetite sated. I just had a very large hamburger and French fries for dinner. My stomach is very full and my appetite is sated. Put me someplace where I starving and I'm sure I'd be willing to eat the meat surrounding your asshole. People do what they gotta do to survive. Do I like the thought of that? HELL NO! But then again, I'm not that hungry right now. Ever seen the movie "Alive" where they each the butts of the dead? People gotta do what they gotta do to survive. It's nature. It's easy to sit in judgment when you've not had to walk in those shoes.
But sitting in judgment is exactly what you are doing, by pretending that your atheist or agnostic responders are somehow advocating rape. They told you they are not; they gave you reasons why they are not; but you continue to pretend that they do. This makes yourself, your brothers, your religion, your God out to be a liar. It turns the very people you want to reach against you so harshly that they will spread this condemnation of your God to anybody who will listen.

It is you who are giving the Holy Spirit a bad name, you who are barring the little ones from coming to Jesus, you who are judging over the commandment to judge not. Stop it.
Thorn, the bible and your religion and you yourself makes your religion look bad all by itself it doesn't need help from us.
avatar
ThoRn: I have to wonder about some of you atheists myself. I certainly don't believe a true Christian goes around raping and murdering anyone. But an atheist wolf dressed in Christian sheep wool might. How can you have morality without religion? Where does your morality come from? And furthermore how come your morality is so much like mine? We both agree that rape and murder is wrong. But how can that be? I choose not to rape because it's sin and I've got enough self-control to not give into that sin.
Really? Where do you get this from the bible? All it says is do not rape virgins, who are betrothed, because it would be like stealing property from another man. The rest of the women are fair game. And in war it is highly encouraged. So I ask you, how did you get morality DESPITE being religious?
avatar
hedwards: Virtually everybody has some sort of royalty in their blood line at some point. The main reason being that royalty had the resources to have a ton of children that were themselves in a position to do favorably with the opposite sex.
avatar
cjrgreen: Even allowing for that, the number of direct descendants of males in the immediate family of Genghis Khan is something extraordinary.

What is invariably overlooked by those who deny the credibility of evolution is that organized religion is itself a tool that powerful men use to force women to bear children for men who use the tools of the religion to control them. As such, it would be an evolutionarily stable strategy par excellence if there were shown to be any kind of inherited foundation for it.

Who needs rape when you can accomplish the same purpose by making submission and reproduction into religious obligations?
Failing that, even just barring effective birth control does the trick. Like it or not, most women like sex, at least enough to have it a dozen or so times during a life time. Which means that they could relatively easily be unlucky enough to get pregnant a quarter or a third of the time. And that's assuming they're settling for just a dozen times.

In practice, I suspect that the number of times one has sex before becoming pregnant is probably lower and the number of times those women have sex is higher.

Seems odd to me that so many people buy into the notion that God would require people to not use birth control and not provide some reasonable method of preventing pregnancy. Especially seeing as unwanted pregnancy is a huge reason why poverty exists in some segments of the population. Unwanted children and inadequate social support.
avatar
ThoRn: I have to wonder about some of you atheists myself. I certainly don't believe a true Christian goes around raping and murdering anyone. But an atheist wolf dressed in Christian sheep wool might. How can you have morality without religion? Where does your morality come from? And furthermore how come your morality is so much like mine? We both agree that rape and murder is wrong. But how can that be? I choose not to rape because it's sin and I've got enough self-control to not give into that sin.
avatar
jamotide: Really? Where do you get this from the bible? All it says is do not rape virgins, who are betrothed, because it would be like stealing property from another man. The rest of the women are fair game. And in war it is highly encouraged. So I ask you, how did you get morality DESPITE being religious?
I wonder sometimes if these people have ever actually read the Bible. Personally, I try not to covet my neighbor's oxen, because having sex with sheep is probably less dangerous.
Post edited January 24, 2014 by hedwards
I'm convinced now, ThoRn is an elaborate troll.
avatar
kalirion: I'm convinced now, ThoRn is an elaborate troll.
I dunno, it's basically impossible to tell the difference between a troll and a Bible thumper sometimes. I think we need to build a bridge out of him. That should settle the matter.
avatar
Cormoran: The only thing that would stop me from wanting this is the sick shit he'd do to his family and neighbours for us to find out. On the other hand he may be doing that already and simply considering it his godly duty.
avatar
ThoRn: I have to wonder about some of you atheists myself. I certainly don't believe a true Christian goes around raping and murdering anyone.
This just means you're not a true christian, the bible has several examples of condoning rape and murder. Stop cherry picking, it'll wind you up in hell.
But an atheist wolf dressed in Christian sheep wool might.
That's actually just a better christian than you. One that isn't going to hell.
How can you have morality without religion?
With ease.
Where does your morality come from?
Myself and those who brought me up.
And furthermore how come your morality is so much like mine?
Our morality is nothing alike. Your religious based morality is sickening.
We both agree that rape and murder is wrong. But how can that be?
Except that you're unsure if you'd do it if you hadn't cherry picked your bronze age book of mythologies.
I choose not to rape because it's sin and I've got enough self-control to not give into that sin.
I don't need the eternal punishment that comes with sin to not do it, I have the unfortunately intimate understanding of what such an act does to someone. I don't do it because I don't want to, it's a horrifying experience for the victim.
I do lust however but not so much that's I'd be willing to rape and hurt a woman over it. I prefer it when the woman consents as that makes me feel loved and desired in return. I can't say I'd get any thrill out of raping a woman. Then again, I've never tried it and don't plan on it. If the world were to suddenly fall apart and become completely chaotic I don't know what I'd do or be capable of? I'd still have my religious morals at first but I'm sure brutality of such a savage environment can take a toll on anyone's views in life and force them to change. The old military saying is, "Adapt, improvise, and overcome".
I lust too, it's what my left hand is for. I don't need to rape someone to bust a nut, ever, under no circumstances, at all, post apocalyptic fantasy land or not. No book necessary (well, maybe a hustler...)
Ever watch "The Walking Dead"? I think that show does a good job of showing how people can change radically in their views on certain issues and before long people learn real quick that it's kill or be killed. Rape or be raped. Eat or starve. Shelter or freeze. Is that the type of world I want? Hell no. I'm comfy with modern day living and all the willing women in short skirts that WANT sex for cheap. I do admit feminism HAS given men some nice benefits.
False equivalency, if someone wants to rape you, you defend yourself. You don't need to then rape them, so no, it's not rape or be raped. Stop fantasising about raping people!

Also the walking dead is a comic. That stuff all happens with drama in mind, the circumstances are hilarious and require an amazing amount of suspension of disbelief. I could just as easily ask if you've ever watched "Star Trek" to show just how far humans can go for the better, minus your book of fables.
low rated
avatar
QC: Why do atheist have morals? Because humans long ago decided that hurting other humans is a dickish way to go about things. Oh, but religious worlds far back, for the past thousands of years have waged wars against other nations, other cultures, other religions for all of Humanity. They killed to serve their country. They killed to serve their gods and bring glory to their gods. The reason why we don't have that today is the world is more inter-reliant and we've come to accept cultural differences, including religious difference. A tribe does not destroy itself when it is surviving reasonably. That's regardless of religion or society.
Bullshit! You got you moral values from the same source I did. Your parents who were probably religious or their parents were before them and the morals were passed on from parent to child. Ever seen the movie Greystoke about the boy who was shipwrecked on an island with a bunch of chimps? The chimps raised him and years later when he was found as a grown man, he acted like a chimp. They brought him back to his families estate in the UK but he couldn't adapt to civilized society after lots of efforts to educate him and change him. But he still acted out on his chimpish ways from time to time until it was decided he needed to go back to the island and be set free with the chimps that raised him. If you had grown up with no moral religious teachings you'd adapt to the world on your own or by whoever or whatever decided to raise you, be it apes or chimps, or whatever. It's easy for you to claim that the world would have been so perfect without religion and that religion is the root of all evil when that's not true. It's the very thing that's brought people together under a set of values and customs.
avatar
iippo: That would be utterly personal.

Deeply religious person may recover from hard times because he/she will perhaps have support from community, has the possibility to think stuff like "its God's plan" or whatever and sort of accept whatever comes etc..

But really, its nothing magical. The person does not live longer because God gives him or her superhuman powers - rather the person gets support from extended social network and may have various guidelines to rely on.

However, one might have these same supports from hobby, work community, neighbours and so on.

But yes, i do agree that religions may have beneficial effect on people in this sense - but ofcourse there are many flipsides as well. Then again, religions are, or atleast should be rather personal matters in the first place, so everyone should use their own heads and hearts instead of following any group or say-so person to find out if they are any good or not.
avatar
Reever: I never said it's magic. I only wanted to show that there are benefits to what some people call "fairy tales" and such, without really thinking about the ramifications. People can do many stuff when just believing in them, the human psyche is something we don't understand to the fullest.

And I don't think it had anything to do with the community, it was just something with having an inner peace, or to be more specific less stress. But I'm not sure anymore, so don't take my word on that.

[url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/17/health/17faith.html]are some articles I found after doing a quick search on google. And the article I'm talking about might have been in the "Spiegel", but I'm not going to search for it now.

People (especially those who're thinking scientifically, or at least are thinking they do) should maybe consider why something that's unnecessary has been still a part of us as a species for so long. I think the biggest mistake one can make is to say "it's just shit anyway" and be done with it.
To put this in very-very rough way: People who are very social tend to be more happy and healthy, than people who are not social. Socially active people do get depressed as easily and when they do get, the recover faster than their counterparts. Also loners commit suicides more often than those who have support network of people (community) around them.

Religious people tend to be more social and communal than nonreligious people. Also religious people tend to feel that it gives them "purpose" in their life.

Social support + community + feeling of purpose = pretty damn rare these days

The roots of humanity lie in tribal communities, not as much in lonewolves. Ofcourse these things vary from person to person - but i believe this is not too far off the mark.

Also some religions come with guidelines to what to eat and what not to eat. So if your religion promotes vegeterian food and is against drinking alcohol for example, then ofcourse you have fair chance of living longer than those around you.

I might be wrong, but some parts of Russia for example are gaining on muslim population simply because of their average life expectancy (males) is far longer than ordinary russians life expectancy. Has supposedly whole lot to do with drinking vodka. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Russia#Life_expectancy
avatar
QC: Why do atheist have morals? Because humans long ago decided that hurting other humans is a dickish way to go about things. Oh, but religious worlds far back, for the past thousands of years have waged wars against other nations, other cultures, other religions for all of Humanity. They killed to serve their country. They killed to serve their gods and bring glory to their gods. The reason why we don't have that today is the world is more inter-reliant and we've come to accept cultural differences, including religious difference. A tribe does not destroy itself when it is surviving reasonably. That's regardless of religion or society.
avatar
ThoRn: Bullshit! You got you moral values from the same source I did. Your parents who were probably religious or their parents were before them and the morals were passed on from parent to child. Ever seen the movie Greystoke about the boy who was shipwrecked on an island with a bunch of chimps? The chimps raised him and years later when he was found as a grown man, he acted like a chimp. They brought him back to his families estate in the UK but he couldn't adapt to civilized society after lots of efforts to educate him and change him. But he still acted out on his chimpish ways from time to time until it was decided he needed to go back to the island and be set free with the chimps that raised him. If you had grown up with no moral religious teachings you'd adapt to the world on your own or by whoever or whatever decided to raise you, be it apes or chimps, or whatever. It's easy for you to claim that the world would have been so perfect without religion and that religion is the root of all evil when that's not true. It's the very thing that's brought people together under a set of values and customs.
It's what you're taught and that doesn't require religion one iota.
avatar
ThoRn: Bullshit! You got you moral values from the same source I did. Your parents who were probably religious or their parents were before them and the morals were passed on from parent to child. Ever seen the movie Greystoke about the boy who was shipwrecked on an island with a bunch of chimps? The chimps raised him and years later when he was found as a grown man, he acted like a chimp. They brought him back to his families estate in the UK but he couldn't adapt to civilized society after lots of efforts to educate him and change him. But he still acted out on his chimpish ways from time to time until it was decided he needed to go back to the island and be set free with the chimps that raised him. If you had grown up with no moral religious teachings you'd adapt to the world on your own or by whoever or whatever decided to raise you, be it apes or chimps, or whatever. It's easy for you to claim that the world would have been so perfect without religion and that religion is the root of all evil when that's not true. It's the very thing that's brought people together under a set of values and customs.
This whole text is simply one arbitrary (and very very self-centered, radically ethnocentric) personal belief.

You can only sustain it either by broadening the term "religion" to the point where it means absolutely nothing in particular, or by considering that any population acculturated by missionaries were, before that, "immoral" populations and living in a state of "savagery".
Post edited January 24, 2014 by Telika
low rated
*grabspopcorn*