mrkgnao: While I respect your opinion, I find it mildly condescending that you can read through hundreds of posts across numerous threads where many goglodytes have vented their frustration for days and months about these issues and not consider it "genuinely upsetting".
StingingVelvet: It's not condescending to disagree on what's upsetting in this world. If you just mean the way I write, well... my style is my style, some people see it that way. No personal insult is intended. However I'll point out that usually any stance on DRM that doesn't fit perfectly into the extreme stances some take on here tends to be treated as insane heresy, which might not be the nicest thing in the world either.
When people are passionate about things they tend to convert that into rage, judgment, hate, etc. Just look at our political discussions right now in the West. I always try and take a pragmatic and middle-ground view, that's just who I am. I don't see clients as DRM, in fact I'd go so far as to say clients are objectively not DRM on their own, but since I like to compromise I'll agree some come here to avoid clients and it's a shame GOG is pushing Galaxy more and more. I just don't personally care, and you can't make me care, ya know?
Galaxy is still new. It's still in open beta, makes sense there pushing it more and more. I only use Galaxy to download my offline installers, so GOG hasn't changed much for me. A lot of the games people claim have DRM are over exaggerating. The games are still playable without Galaxy. Sorry about my grammar I'm dyslexic