It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Playing, and successfully completing the entire MYST series, before Cyan began recycling the original game every five years or so. Now they've moved on to Riven. That was a classic for the ages. What next, MGM remaking "Gone with the Wind"?
I'm with CarChris here and say that just finishing a game may be a feat. And a year in which I manage to reach my target of finishing five games and at least four of them are "proper" ones, not some quick little things that I just breezed through to add to the number, definitely is a feat.

For things that were difficult but felt good to complete in a memorable way, on the other hand, I'd list the final scenario of the original Tropico 3 campaign, also the last one of Age of Wonders 2: Wizard's Throne, or those towards the end of Worms: Armageddon where you're so outrageously outnumbered and outgunned. And then there are things like the last few missions of The Lost Vikings that seemed made by a sadist, so they were awfully frustrating but did feel like an achievement when I finally beat them, or on the other hand the final battle in Diablo 2: Lord of Destruction, which marked finally ending a game I utterly dreaded and which was utter frustration start to end, referring to both Diablo 2 as a whole and that battle in itself, and I don't even know whether I was more relieved at having finished it or more angry that I persisted in putting myself through that.
Gaming has no accomplishments, any more than eating for the purpose of getting fat.
One other accomplishment: Fixing a bug in an obscure Apple 2 game without the source code. (Unfortunately, I haven't published the fix anywhere, and I'm not sure where my record of what the fix was is.)
Beating Donkey Kong Country 2 in one sitting. Back then I had no SNES and had to play at the local renting store. I was pissed that my save kept being deleted, I thought someone was messing with me and not realizing all saves were wiped out when the console turns off.

So I said fuck it, rented 5 hours and did it in one go. By the end all the locals were watching me take down the last boss and celebrating the ending with me. It was a very memorable day.

Other crazy stuff I did:

- Beating Kid Chameleon in one sitting. Whole thing took almost 2 hours
- Beating all 100 levels of Thexder Neo in one go. There's no save feature and I was shooting for the #1 spot in the rankings. Not only I had to do it in one sitting but also had to clean every level of all enemies and beat them as fast as possible for maximum points. The entire ordeal took 8 hours, I was seeing stars by the end. And ultimately only reached #2 position. But I was happy nonetheless.
Adjusting the Xenia emulator, figuring out a way to eliminate the audio desync in cutscenes in Saints Row 1. Haven't played the game yet though :P

Also maybe 100%ing Rayman 1 without a guide.
Playing the entire Tomb Raider (2013) with the basic version of the bow.
avatar
Ruldra: Beating Donkey Kong Country 2 in one sitting. Back then I had no SNES and had to play at the local renting store. I was pissed that my save kept being deleted, I thought someone was messing with me and not realizing all saves were wiped out when the console turns off.

So I said fuck it, rented 5 hours and did it in one go. By the end all the locals were watching me take down the last boss and celebrating the ending with me. It was a very memorable day.

Other crazy stuff I did:

- Beating Kid Chameleon in one sitting. Whole thing took almost 2 hours
- Beating all 100 levels of Thexder Neo in one go. There's no save feature and I was shooting for the #1 spot in the rankings. Not only I had to do it in one sitting but also had to clean every level of all enemies and beat them as fast as possible for maximum points. The entire ordeal took 8 hours, I was seeing stars by the end. And ultimately only reached #2 position. But I was happy nonetheless.
That is quite impressive. Those old games are really tough. I am too young to have played the SNES era a lot (though I did play a lot of DKC1 as a kid).

I've played through some games in one sitting that are actually of decent length. Beyond Good & Evil is one, but I have played through it many times and know everything about it. And the first time I played Mirror's Edge, I finished it in that same sitting.

avatar
D.esperado: Playing the entire Tomb Raider (2013) with the basic version of the bow.
That actually sounds like a pretty fun challenge. It can be fun to play through some games with only the starter weapon. I remember getting the achievement for carrying the basic pistol through the entire game when Duke Nukem Forever came out, hehe.. You could only hold two weapons (but it was later patched to 4).

Fallout: New Vegas can also make for some interesting playthroughs for example if you focus on a build only on fistfighting or basic weapons.
When I was a teenager, I beat Contra on the original NES without Konami code. I don't think I could do that nowdays.

I and my best friend cleared all Super Mario World levels on SNES together. decades ago. It was fun exploring Star and Super secret worlds.

I managed to find all secrets and secret levels of Heretic all 5 episodes years ago.
Beating Spelunky [2012/"HD"] something like a couple dozen times, including at least a few times by beating the hidden boss (where reaching said boss is much more difficult than beating him once there).
Ditching Windows in favour of Linux (Ubuntu at the time) in 2007~2008, while keeping the ability to play my video games. Hint for Valve supporters: that’s 10 years before the original release of Proton ;)
avatar
D.esperado: Playing the entire Tomb Raider (2013) with the basic version of the bow.
avatar
Random_Coffee: That actually sounds like a pretty fun challenge. It can be fun to play through some games with only the starter weapon. I remember getting the achievement for carrying the basic pistol through the entire game when Duke Nukem Forever came out, hehe.. You could only hold two weapons (but it was later patched to 4).
In the Final Fantasy 10 community, there's actually a challenge rule where you play through the entire game with the starting weapon with each character (but are allowed to customize it; be aware, however, that customization can't be undone).

Incidentally, I'd like to see someone do an ANONSIENC run of that game. Rules are:
* Ability Nodes Only: You may use the Sphere Grid, but are only allowed to activate nodes that grant new abilities, This means you play through the entire game with just starting stats. (This is less restrictive than the popular No Sphere Grid rule. For those not familiar with this game, but familiar with other RPGs, this rule is comparable to beating the game at level 1.)
* No Summons: You are not allowed to use Yuna's summon command, except during the rare occurrences that the game forces you to (like during the summon tutorial). This rule is there because summons can get stronger even if you don't/
* Initial Equipment: You must leave each character with their starting equipment.
* No Customization: You aren't allowed to customize your equipment. (Without the IE rule, this means you have to hunt down equipment with the combination of effects you want, limiting the combinations you can use.)

(Note that I have never played FF10, but I've seen some NSG videos and read some things about the strategy. There's still broken things, like a certain overdrive that makes all your attacks deal 9,999 damage/healing, however. By the way, for this game challenge videos are much more entertaining than post-game superboss videos, and except for the unspkippable cutscenes (one reason for me not wanting to actually play this game), probably considerably more fun to play.)


avatar
Random_Coffee: Fallout: New Vegas can also make for some interesting playthroughs for example if you focus on a build only on fistfighting or basic weapons.
Try doing Arena or Daggerfall without weapons. (For Arena, you might want to play a spellcaster so you can boost your Strength with a spell; also, I believe unarmed attacks can crash the game.) Remember those enemies that can only be hurt by certain materials? Well, your unarmed attacks ignore that.

Battlespire is also a good game to play without weapons, and that may actually be easier than using weapons. When you factor in weapon durabilities and the fact that you can be staggered or made to drop your weapon if you have a weapon equipped, then factor in the unarmed combat skill that improves through usage, you see that the game strongly favors unarmed combat.

On the other hand, there's a fare number of games where I find I prefer not to use armor. For example, in Final Fantasy 2 heavy armor is a trap option; using it will hurt you significantly in the long run, to the point of causing you to get a game over before you act when an armorless party (except for shields) would win without taking damage. Or Might & Magic 4-5, where AC does nothing against many enemies, and armor breaks when you are reduced to -10 HP, which is annoying to keep fixing.

Also, in Final Fantasy 1, as well as in Bard's Tale 1 and 3, the best damage you get is with an unarmed Monk attacking. (Although, in BT3 you may instead prefer instant kills later on (especially in the final dungeon) because of how high enemy HP goes.)
Post edited January 28, 2025 by dtgreene
avatar
vv221: Ditching Windows in favour of Linux (Ubuntu at the time) in 2007~2008, while keeping the ability to play my video games. Hint for Valve supporters: that’s 10 years before the original release of Proton ;)
That is around the same time I tried Linux. My first distro was Mint 3.1, which I installed on my laptop (I miss that HP zv5000!). I wasn't as tech savvy at the time though, and I was only interested in gaming on the PC, so my first ventures into Linux ended shortly after. But I did enjoy the general utility and look of the system, and had a huge respect for it. I ended up trying out Linux again about 10 years later, and it has really come a long way for gaming now.

avatar
dtgreene: Try doing Arena or Daggerfall without weapons. (For Arena, you might want to play a spellcaster so you can boost your Strength with a spell; also, I believe unarmed attacks can crash the game.) Remember those enemies that can only be hurt by certain materials? Well, your unarmed attacks ignore that.
I did decide that this would be the year I finally finish Daggerfall, after starting various saves over the years and gaining decent progress in some of them. I don't think I would try a unarmed build for a first time through the main story, but it could be a fun challenge later on.
avatar
dtgreene: Try doing Arena or Daggerfall without weapons. (For Arena, you might want to play a spellcaster so you can boost your Strength with a spell; also, I believe unarmed attacks can crash the game.) Remember those enemies that can only be hurt by certain materials? Well, your unarmed attacks ignore that.
avatar
Random_Coffee: I did decide that this would be the year I finally finish Daggerfall, after starting various saves over the years and gaining decent progress in some of them. I don't think I would try a unarmed build for a first time through the main story, but it could be a fun challenge later on.
I'm not 100% sure that an unarmed build would actually be a challenge.

I know it's not a challenge in Battlespire, given all the issues that apply when using weapons and not bare hands. Just start with high Strength (I think that's the governing stat), avoid non-scamp enemies at first, and as your skill improves you'll get a good attack that you won't need to conserve and that doesn't put you at risk of being staggered or disarmed.
avatar
Random_Coffee: That is around the same time I tried Linux. My first distro was Mint 3.1 (…)
Wow, I had no idea Linux Mint was already available at the time!
But you’re right, when I tried Linux for the first time Linux Mint 3.1 or 4.0 was the current version.

avatar
Random_Coffee: I wasn't as tech savvy at the time though (…)
I was not either ;)
But I quickly felt that Linux (Ubuntu, then Debian) was much easier to use than Windows (XP at the time), so I never went back.