Posted May 12, 2019
morolf: I think I read parts of that more than 20 years ago.
The thing with Stalin is that he's often presented just as a psycho criminal, basically some Caucasus bandit who just happened to become dictator of one of the most powerful states in the world. Obviously that isn't convincing, so I'm interested, if Kotkin can give some answer about the reasons for Stalin's success.
From what I've read it seems he knew how and when to go along with the revolution, and how and when to abandon it. Teaming up with creeps like Kalinin and Molotov certainly helped him along the way. He backstabbed, schemed, and crawled his way to the top. When you look at power structures, government, mafia, corporate, etc, the tactics are usually the very similar. Like Hitler, Stalin knew when to wear certain disguises and when to take them off. The thing with Stalin is that he's often presented just as a psycho criminal, basically some Caucasus bandit who just happened to become dictator of one of the most powerful states in the world. Obviously that isn't convincing, so I'm interested, if Kotkin can give some answer about the reasons for Stalin's success.
Ultimately, that's the paradigm that needs to be addressed. Whether a social/political revolution has purpose and support from the people, its leaders need to be watched like a hawk. Usually, it's self-serving egomaniacs that take the revolution to its final end, and for their own end, that's what gets nations in trouble. And somehow along the way it usually also ends with mass graves, censorship, and top-down oppression. But hey, capitalism is bad and stuff so let's just pack some more families off to Siberia. That'll fix it.