It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
rjbuffchix: Dude, there is nothing "big" about the button. Yes it is there for those who look. Sort of like the "uncheck" box every time Flash updates and wants you to install bloatware with it. It's there, but the intention is surely not for the customer to click on it. The default "best" way that GOG portrays is Galaxy.
By "big" I meant it's right there/decently sized, and not tucked away in the corner of the screen/page & smaller than one's mouse cursor. :)

Also I agree the offline installer option could be highlighted a bit better, but it's not like GOG is trying to hide it to an "extreme" level(like some sites/installers do with some options).

The button/option is right below the galaxy download button is decent sized font....so people should be able to find it(though again, yes, it could be made a bit more obvious).

avatar
rjbuffchix: Also, please let me know when there are "check out our offline installer" buttons plastered on EVERY page of the site.
That is the galaxy installer button(for just the galaxy installer).....also maybe they could write beneath it a line stating "check out our offline installers in your GOG game library!" as well.

avatar
rjbuffchix: Btw what's scary is that the Galaxy-pushing has clearly worked on influencing an audience. Across many topics, people are calling this store itself "GOG Galaxy".
It's likely because many use galaxy and that whole "band aid" effect is at play(i.e. people calling things by more well known terms than the right ones...like with people calling adhesive strips band aids).

avatar
rjbuffchix: There is no factual way to claim that Galaxy and offline installers receive equal treatment. And that's without even getting into how offline installers are out of date and iirc sometimes users have even had to nag GOG to get the offline installers updated, when Galaxy was up to date the whole way.
Agreed somewhat on this.....won't go much more into it atm as strapped for time(leaving home to shop in an hour or less) and I cannot think properly on some things currently, but agreed a bit on this.

(Essentially I cannot think of the right way to write a reply to this beyond what I just wrote)

avatar
rjbuffchix: You're right on at least the first part of that, though that's not really where I was going with that quote...what I'm saying is that once CDPR themselves made a DRMed game and the store here featured it, this definitively tells customers that DRM is okay here (at least conditionally). My point is that you can't put the genie back in the bottle, un-ring the bell, [insert cliche here].
Agreed.....I mainly said what I did as I usually don't like it when I see people doing what I consider "packing over very little/with little reason to".

(This is not to say the issues aren't worth discussing or important to some degree, though :))

avatar
rjbuffchix: Here is the thing, and I forget if I already made this point to you or a different user,

Anticonsumer practices tend to happen gradually. Accepting some light anticonsumer practices in the present, paves the way for worse anticonsumer practices in the future. The time to keep an eye is now. Nip anticonsumer practices in the bud now. Also, this is a big enough issue right now anyway, and I don't appreciate that being minimized. Due to everyone compromising so much already, the vast majority of games' multiplayers are DRMed. I want to buy DRM free multiplayer games, which used to exist btw, but thanks to such minimizing about DRMed multiplayer nowadays "it's not a big deal, it's small potatoes", I am not given that option.
Again, this is making assumptions(that worse WILL happen for certain).....given the good GOG has done I am willing to give them more benefit of the doubt until I see that "the sky is falling"(as the saying goes), but if I saw certain signs i'd likely be "in the trenches" right alongside you.

As for others disallowing you from certain options......to be fair you disallow yourself seemingly a good number of things in the world of gaming based mainly on moral stances that you could easily buy/play without said stances.....so it's not just other people's purchasing decisions/allowances of GOG/etc that affect what you can play/consume/etc.

(The above line is just a statement of how I see it and not meant to be a jab against you, btw...just making sure you know that. :))
avatar
zazak09: Is there a way to skip logging in for Galaxy 2.0?
i do not know, for gog games yes because you can still go into the folder find the .exe and run that and no galaxy will be needed
avatar
toupz111: Games force gog galaxy client to open whenever i launch the executable from desktop even though i downloaded without galaxy as offline backup option i shouldn't need to go to my installation folder and change the exe or whatever this is worrying, is GoG slowly becoming drm? I also know there is a list of games that 100% require the galaxy client for multiplayer, now i'm not saying it is a bad client at all but as a customer with my soul and purchases tied to the drm free feature, should GoG turn into drm i think i will give up on gaming. I also believe in lan network which is dying because kids want everything easy (Steam invite to lobby) for exemple...someone enlighten me about Gog's direction..
Just "fix" the shortcut on your desktop. Galaxy unfortunately detects your installed GOG games and turns their shortcuts so they are opened through Galaxy. However, you can easily change the shortcut back to its previous state. I know it is very annoying, I even opened a topic about that a year ago.

Sorry if this was mentioned before. I didn't read all of the replies.
avatar
zazak09: Is there a way to skip logging in for Galaxy 2.0?
avatar
teceem: Not that I know of... maybe when it comes out of Beta?
If you want an offline launcher, try Playnite, or Launchbox.

Playnite looks a lot like Galaxy 2.0 (but Playnite was first, so it's the other way around).
I use Launchbox (free version) and is fine.
The Windows instalation I'm in is probably 1.5 years old and has been on a dozen diferent computers and 4 or 5 SSD's. Never had a major problem with Launchbox, the only complaint is that uses over 1Gig of RAM and is quite slow to launch on a mechanical hard drive. Maybe just being picky :D
Pretty much all my installed GOG games go there.

Next Windows install (probably soon) will go Bigbox or maybe give Galaxy 2.0 a try.
Attachments:
Post edited February 17, 2020 by Dark_art_
avatar
nightcraw1er.488: Most installers, including offline backup installers, now contain parts of galaxy.
Quoted for truth.

I have one computer where Galaxy is installed, but after some ISP fuckups I didn't renew with them and don't have internet access in that computer anymore. Since then every time I install a game I use only the offline installers, obviously. (I left Galaxy installed but never run it because I plan to move to a new house with a new ISP in a few months)

Did you know that, in a situation like mine where you have Galaxy installed but not running, if you click the game shortcut any other time it will just run the game as you would expect but if you click Yes to the question at the end of installation it will start Galaxy instead?

As I said, I am obviously and definitely using the offline installers. I really wasn't expecting to see Galaxy suddenly come to life.
avatar
joppo: Quoted for truth.

I have one computer where Galaxy is installed, but after some ISP fuckups I didn't renew with them and don't have internet access in that computer anymore. Since then every time I install a game I use only the offline installers, obviously. (I left Galaxy installed but never run it because I plan to move to a new house with a new ISP in a few months)

Did you know that, in a situation like mine where you have Galaxy installed but not running, if you click the game shortcut any other time it will just run the game as you would expect but if you click Yes to the question at the end of installation it will start Galaxy instead?

As I said, I am obviously and definitely using the offline installers. I really wasn't expecting to see Galaxy suddenly come to life.
Yeah, the launch button on the backup installer process has a nasty habit of launching the game through galaxy, booting the client in the process It's easy to remember this fact and ignore the Launch button.
I know that they used to give out DRM-free cake back in the days. Sure was delicious ;). Cheers

EDIT: Here is the link to the promo video, voiced by the dearly missed EnigmaticT :): https://youtu.be/jY2d54oDZyc
Post edited February 19, 2020 by deja65
avatar
Black_Star1986: The only and truly DRM-free games are pirated games. >:D
Why are you on GOG, then?

*confused*
avatar
Black_Star1986: The only and truly DRM-free games are pirated games. >:D
Isnt this a bannable offense?
avatar
Black_Star1986: The only and truly DRM-free games are pirated games. >:D
avatar
zgrillo2004: Isnt this a bannable offense?
PROMOTING or linking to such is a punishable offense, not mentioning the word or discussing it in all ways.

avatar
Black_Star1986: The only and truly DRM-free games are pirated games. >:D
avatar
TheBigCore: Why are you on GOG, then?

*confused*
Maybe they want to show support to GOG or the devs?

Also IIRC/afaik, a good number of users here were former pirates at some point. :)
Post edited February 26, 2020 by GameRager
avatar
zgrillo2004: Isnt this a bannable offense?
avatar
GameRager: PROMOTING or linking to such is a punishable offense, not mentioning the word or discussing it in all ways.

avatar
TheBigCore: Why are you on GOG, then?

*confused*
avatar
GameRager: Maybe they want to show support to GOG or the devs?

Also IIRC/afaik, a good number of users here were former pirates at some point. :)
Gotcha. Thanks.
Saying such things is not bannable i belive but beeing a bot this dumb is :)
The bot re-quotet post 27 in this thread
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/wasnt_gog_drm_free_before/post27
avatar
zgrillo2004: Gotcha. Thanks.
Np :)
==============================================

avatar
Dreaganos: Saying such things is not bannable i belive but beeing a bot this dumb is :)
The bot re-quotet post 27 in this thread
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/wasnt_gog_drm_free_before/post27
They usually do that(snip a bit from a post in the same thread)...what makes it dumb, though, imo is that they do so to get their rep UP to post links yet this one picked a low rated post to copy. :)
Post edited February 26, 2020 by GameRager
avatar
GameRager: They usually do that(snip a bit from a post in the same thread)...what makes it dumb, though, imo is that they do so to get their rep UP to post links yet this one picked a low rated post to copy. :)
Yeah a post that draw too much attention :)
avatar
GameRager: They usually do that(snip a bit from a post in the same thread)...what makes it dumb, though, imo is that they do so to get their rep UP to post links yet this one picked a low rated post to copy. :)
avatar
Dreaganos: Yeah a post that draw too much attention :)
Tbh I am starting to wonder if they just don't care/get paid by each post they make(and not how good they are) as they often make no sense/aren't very convincing & likely don't get many people to click their links. :)