paladin181: The games kind of ignore the mostly nihilistic ending of the books and take the fake story Ciri was making up to make herself feel better as what happened. Pretty silly overall, but hey. Oh if that spoiled the books for anyone, remember, it's the journey, not the destination. Really, you should read these books if you haven't yet.
RWarehall: Not sure I believe that as Sapkowski himself has been quoted to suggest there could be more to the story. Trying to stay spoiler free...
This is a minor spoiler for Season of Storms: there is something of overarcing... flashforward? (I'm not sure what to call it) in that book, a series of interludes set a long time after the "proper" events of the book, and even after the Saga, that tease certain... possibilities regarding Geralt. He's pretty much definately not 100% gone. However, I think it's still pretty much in the air whether Sapkowski uses that to write a sequel. He could write something that happens hundreds of years before Geralt's birth just as well, or go back to writing things unrelated to the Witcher. Sadly, Sapkowski writes even more slowly than R.R.Martin :D
willyum: Thanks for all the replies! I don't believe the last two books have been translated/released in English yet, so I've been pulling information from Wikipedia. I don't believe Season of Storms has been released in English, which is most unfortunate.
Well, not all that unfortunate. Maybe slightly unfortunate. It's not a bad book exactly, it's still way above the average fantasy stuff, but it's not nearly as good as the rest. It really feels like he took some unfinished stories he abandoned years ago, and put them together to form a novel.