Posted December 27, 2014



Not wanting to raise prices (I assume you're talking about Nordic) is not a principle. Several classics (Interplay) have had a price increase at some point in the past (just as some had their price decreased too) for that matter.
Nordic wanting regional prices for their catalog in a store that just allowed regional prices isn't simply a case of terminal greed either: because while they'd charge more in Europe, it's also true they'd charge less in South America and Russia. It's all relative.
Now, if we're talking principles, you either believe regional prices are bad for your customers (that was their old reasoning, wasn't it?) and refuse them, or you don't. There's no middle ground here. Saying yes for new games but no for classics (which is meaningless anyway as long as they don't tell us their definition of classic) makes no sense, because as far as principles go, they threw everything out of the window the moment they chose to adopt regional prices for the first time (emphasis on chose, and not counting TW2 obviously).
They're just trying to stand with the feet on two boats, throwing a bandaid fix here and there. Remains to be seen if the risk of alienating the old consumer base is justified by the potential gains, but that's not something that can be judged in the short term.
That's totally up to you to decide. If you feel so strongly about Gog's new policies, by any means, let them know in whatever way you deem appropriate. Tbh, if I were here for their principles, I would have stopped buying anything long ago. Mind you, I hate throwing the "vote with your wallet" card, it almost never works... still, it may be the one language Gog understands most at this point.