Jeebus, she looks about 12!
I wonder sometimes how much unproductive thought-policing is caused just by the internet giving an equal platform to overly-idealistic teenagers...
#ageist and proud

9/10 would agree again

Compared to this, even those problems can be seen as minor depending on the perspective. Everybody should have seen this movie at least once.
Stuff like this is what I think of when I see social study hipsters, professional victims and their whole crowd (which is mostly called SJWs now) eating burgers, throwing food away, buying new clothes all the time, using lots of make-up and whatnot for their face/hair to look as unnatural as possible, etc... but as we've seen in this thread some (in fact many) of the very loud ones don't even vote while claiming to make the world a better place. Trolling, doxxing, lying and spreading intolerance and hatred in the net, universities and now even the industry is so much more convenient than rethinking your life and trying to figure out what kind of impact you actually have on others and your environment and if this impact is constructive at all.

People boo at a nude rape scene in a theater play : http://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3bmqt5/nude_rape_scene_booed_by_royal_opera_house/

I also love how all these SJWs seem to make up excuses to support one another. I looked up one article that basically claimed it was fine for Shanley to Doxx Milo because he gave her his phone number...and then went on and on about the post harassment that occurred...

So how many of these lunatics go around doxxing people then cry like crazy when it happens to them? We had Zoe Quinn and Helldump and TFYC. All fine when she did it...

Shanley the same way...

Talk about entitlement...

People just need to understand that people who fight in the name of minorities are more equal than everyone else and can do as they please.

And I love how 49.6% can be a serious minority when you consider "patriarchy"...

And that it's okay to be racist and dehumanizing to all minorities that don't fall in line, don't throw praise at you and claim you don't talk for them.

Apparently the creators of Sunset paid Sarkeesian to support their game (Which she did not but still got the money)
This is why we target indie devs, because they do this kind of crap so often.

http://thegg.net/general-news/leigh-alexander-and-the-sunset-fiasco-the-aftermath/

Brilliant! Makes my day.

/edit: It might have not become 100% clear, but if you read that "article" and honestly think that a two-people game studio has 40k to put into marketing, and would accuse - via twitter - anyone of receiving that money "as a bribe", you are braindead. Literally, braindead. If you don't have the social competence to understand at first sight how those tweets are meant, you don't have the social competence to be among people, ever.

No, really, scientific fact. If you believe that, you do not possess a single living brain cell. Gamergate supporter requirement, I guess.

Minorities who refuse protection by the mob need to know their place.
And when the fuck did everyone from Asia become a ''minority''?
Just shows you can't trust ca-ching oriented professional victims with a degree in dishonesty. Honestly, this makes the ToT guys seem more shady as well. That they'd pay money to a proven radical when they talk about games as art, and the need for expansion and all that. Good find!

I frequent the Know Your Meme entry on #GamerGate, the comments section in the entry has kind of become a separate communiy on its own. I found the article there. They share lots of information. Know Your Meme is apparently one of our most important outposts besides KiA and 8chan, mostly because the guys there make lots of motivational pictures and stuff you can share.
[Edit]
Of course it kind of becomes a circle jerk after a while because most of those who oppose us there are not as based as we are so they either avoid us or end up refuted until they get torn a new one, but that seems to happen everywhere. Very few antis are actually able to equal our side in a match of witts. I guess one of the few antis with enough brains to take us on on a debate might be Bob Chipman, and it is an unconfirmed possibility, well, I think Adam Savage was on the anti side and he would be a true contendent, but he does not really seem interested in fighting us.

No one will be interested in arguing because it won't take more than a few seconds for all AntiGG arguments to be shot down. And the antis can't ever take the risk that their narrative is degenerating and their influence is waning. Eventually, they'll only be composed of the most radical extremist bunch who still somehow stick with Fraudkeesain and Harbour after their hypocrisies. Bob is dangerously delusional. He's the guy saying things like ''we need an audience good enough for the medium'' and other crazy shit. If BC could at some time have had the emotional capacity to debate, its probably gone now. Adam Savage doesn't seem to be on any side. He was asked a fairly biased question and the answer was obviously spun and raped by radfem news sites into a narrative. I don't think he could offer anything at all if he knows none of the facts.

Leigh Alexander (PR for Sunset) supports Javy Gwaltney on Patreon. Five months later, Gwaltney gives Sunset 9.0/10 with no disclosure in the review.

https://twitter.com/EveilCharm/status/615933864586964992

Makes you wonder who suggested the Sunset developers donate to Anita $40k...could it have been their PR person, Leigh Alexander?
The sad thing is that I'm sure the money came in the form of a "donation", so Anita can deny all responsibility.
Reminds me of the movie, the Big Easy about corrupt cops in Louisiana. The part where they are taking donations for the "Widows and Orphans" fund which went to their own pockets...
Of course if they were paying attention, they would have noticed most of Anita's followers don't actually buy games as evidenced by that video awhile back talking about Anita's last video and how when she praised a certain game, the user count on Steam did not go up.