It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
low rated
Who are all those people out the front?
avatar
omega64: While you're here, why don't you take more? :P

You taking it makes sure I will no longer be tempted. :D
avatar
VampiroAlhazred: Mmm... I'll add more temptations to the list instead! xD (Check your chat later, Zeogold ^^)
Damn you!
*shakes fist*
low rated
Oh,I see they are here for freebie's.
*Watches Superstande giving away free icecream outside the building*
avatar
JunglePredator:
Nomination for Legendary.
avatar
JunglePredator:
avatar
omega64: Nomination for Legendary.
Thanks but no thanks.
Already own it & it sucks honestly.
I tried it a couple months ago & uninstalled it.
:-)
avatar
omega64: Nomination for Legendary.
avatar
JunglePredator: Thanks but no thanks.
Already own it & it sucks honestly.
I tried it a couple months ago & uninstalled it.
:-)
Oh well, it's okay.
It's like a playable b movie. :P
avatar
JunglePredator: Thanks but no thanks.
Already own it & it sucks honestly.
I tried it a couple months ago & uninstalled it.
:-)
avatar
omega64: Oh well, it's okay.
It's like a playable b movie. :P
Maybe it hasn't aged well.
Or maybe it's just because bloodlines does the monster game sooo much better.
Dunno.
Just know I wanted to try a game where you could play an "enhanced" human & was really not impressed.
avatar
omega64: Oh well, it's okay.
It's like a playable b movie. :P
avatar
JunglePredator: Maybe it hasn't aged well.
Or maybe it's just because bloodlines does the monster game sooo much better.
Dunno.
Just know I wanted to try a game where you could play an "enhanced" human & was really not impressed.
Yeah, I went into it knowing it was bad.
Just wanted to see the monsters really.
I was satisfied considering playing through only took 4 hours.
If you ever play it I'd recommend playing on easy.
avatar
JunglePredator: Maybe it hasn't aged well.
Or maybe it's just because bloodlines does the monster game sooo much better.
Dunno.
Just know I wanted to try a game where you could play an "enhanced" human & was really not impressed.
avatar
omega64: Yeah, I went into it knowing it was bad.
Just wanted to see the monsters really.
I was satisfied considering playing through only took 4 hours.
If you ever play it I'd recommend playing on easy.
If you're playing because you want to see monsters & don't mind RPG I'd say give Dragon's Dogma or Witcher 3 a go.
They both have good monsters in them; many based on mythology.

If you want to play a monster Vampire: The Masquerade - Bloodlines or Castlevania - Lords Of Shadow 2.
I actually quite liked LOS2; I don't think it deserve the bad rap it got. (Coming from playing most of the castlevania games to the end.) He is human looking but is enhanced & has a few nods to being a vampire... like his weapon is "made of blood".
avatar
omega64: Yeah, I went into it knowing it was bad.
Just wanted to see the monsters really.
I was satisfied considering playing through only took 4 hours.
If you ever play it I'd recommend playing on easy.
avatar
JunglePredator: If you're playing because you want to see monsters & don't mind RPG I'd say give Dragon's Dogma or Witcher 3 a go.
They both have good monsters in them; many based on mythology.

If you want to play a monster Vampire: The Masquerade - Bloodlines or Castlevania - Lords Of Shadow 2.
I actually quite liked LOS2; I don't think it deserve the bad rap it got. (Coming from playing most of the castlevania games to the end.) He is human looking but is enhanced & has a few nods to being a vampire... like his weapon is "made of blood".
I'm planning on getting DD and Witcher 3 eventually.

Just need to convince myself to finish the final chapter of Witcher 2 first.
Which I doubt will happen anytime soon considering i haven't played it in months and uninstalled it a while ago.

I sorta enjoyed playing through Lords of Shadow.
Lords of Shadow 2 made me really nauseous though.
Had to quit after climbing the golem and fighting the boss after.

I've completed... Most of Bloodlines, I'll get back to it someday.
avatar
JunglePredator: If you're playing because you want to see monsters & don't mind RPG I'd say give Dragon's Dogma or Witcher 3 a go.
They both have good monsters in them; many based on mythology.

If you want to play a monster Vampire: The Masquerade - Bloodlines or Castlevania - Lords Of Shadow 2.
I actually quite liked LOS2; I don't think it deserve the bad rap it got. (Coming from playing most of the castlevania games to the end.) He is human looking but is enhanced & has a few nods to being a vampire... like his weapon is "made of blood".
avatar
omega64: I'm planning on getting DD and Witcher 3 eventually.

Just need to convince myself to finish the final chapter of Witcher 2 first.
Which I doubt will happen anytime soon considering i haven't played it in months and uninstalled it a while ago.

I sorta enjoyed playing through Lords of Shadow.
Lords of Shadow 2 made me really nauseous though.
Had to quit after climbing the golem and fighting the boss after.

I've completed... Most of Bloodlines, I'll get back to it someday.
Ah. Very few things make me nauseous. Think there's only been 2 games off hand. Can't remember the names.

You don't technically need to finish the witcher 2 to play the witcher 3. However the character import to 3 can make it harder or easier.... but there is a questionnaire if you want to skip. Be warned it plays differently from the 1st two.
It's a GREAT game but different from the 1st two.
Dragon's Dogma is also amazing but different from the witcher; it takes a more practical look at skills & spells.
People have said it has a bit of Dark Souls in it.... I disagree. It's not that hard... but it has a bit of witcher 3 in it & a bit of Dragon Age: Inquisition in it.
Much better than inquisition however..
Graphic wise it's over the shoulder... almost plays like Batman.
avatar
JunglePredator: Ah. Very few things make me nauseous. Think there's only been 2 games off hand. Can't remember the names.

You don't technically need to finish the witcher 2 to play the witcher 3. However the character import to 3 can make it harder or easier.... but there is a questionnaire if you want to skip. Be warned it plays differently from the 1st two.
It's a GREAT game but different from the 1st two.
Dragon's Dogma is also amazing but different from the witcher; it takes a more practical look at skills & spells.
People have said it has a bit of Dark Souls in it.... I disagree. It's not that hard... but it has a bit of witcher 3 in it & a bit of Dragon Age: Inquisition in it.
Much better than inquisition however..
Graphic wise it's over the shoulder... almost plays like Batman.
I don't usually have those issues with games.
Happens to me with a few games, seems to be triggered in part by heavy amounts of motion blur.

Good, I tolerated the combat in the first game and hated it in the second.

DD is on my wishlist already.
I'll get to it one day. :P
low rated
It's the dynamic duo.
avatar
zeogold: I can tell these games are very deer to you.
Granted.
avatar
JunglePredator: *Slaps Zeogold*

And I'd like to thank Marko for the gift of time.
I'd like to thank donair for feeding me.
And I'd like to *slaps Zeogold*
Wait! I've given you "time". That is what I needed myself (and lots of it). I am sure this is just a big understanding, so please give me my time back ... or at least share it ;)
avatar
omega64: Just need to convince myself to finish the final chapter of Witcher 2 first.
Which I doubt will happen anytime soon considering i haven't played it in months and uninstalled it a while ago.
Oh, you are much better than I am. Although I have played The Witcher 3 for about 10 hours or so (I am slow so I am not far in the game) I still have not even finished "The Witcher 1" (I am in chapter 3 or so) and never even installed "The Witcher 2" ... like I said, I am missing time in my life.
Post edited June 06, 2016 by MarkoH01