It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
rtcvb32: On steam i was downloading games i'd bought before, and try to load them after disabling the steam client. If i couldn't load and play the game, i'd give it a thumbs-down and say it was DRM'd. That was my review.
I'm not saying you aren't justified, but frankly that's just clogging up the reviews while saying nothing about the game itself. And with Steam, well, you get what you pay for.
avatar
Warloch_Ahead: I'm not saying you aren't justified, but frankly that's just clogging up the reviews while saying nothing about the game itself. And with Steam, well, you get what you pay for.
I think i bought the Calypso pack and like 5-10 games ($200 or so) before the effects of DRM hit me and i effectively abandoned steam. All other games i got were from keys from Humble Bundle which i only redeemed like 80 keys after there was no one else to give/trade them with.

But if they don't want to have complaints of their DRM, then they shouldn't put in the DRM... *shrugs*.
The worst thing about game reviews, is when they become outdated, and often they are the review with the most votes for being helpful. But GOG etc don't help in this regard, as notes about bugfixes and updated versions are often missing, or you need to leave the game page and check the forum page for the game or series or worse still go elsewhere on the web, and even then it might not apply to the GOG version.

I'm not advocated editing of reviews, just that we should be able to update them. There should always be a record of what was once true or deemed so. Something like an ADD To Review option, that gets some kind of highlight, but in many cases you would fall foul of the character limit.