It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
I don't like the Larian style dialogues, where you are pushed into making choices without being given enough information, and being given a series of questions but only being able to pick one. Unlike in IE games, where you could ask/pick whatever you wanted, and you would never miss out on obvious questions or being able to ask/talk about more topics unless you picked something that would end the conversation or aggravate the person.

For example you when you meet cultists, they are looking for someone, but you are unable to ask why - you can only tell them where to find X or not. I think this is a crucial point everyone would think of asking.

I'm not a fan of the camera, it's absolutely atrocious. Edge panning doesn't work at the moment, although that might be a bug, so you can't even drag the camera around so it's easier to move around - it currently works just like in DOS1 but without edge panning, you can't angle the camera or up, so you feel like you're missing a part of the picture when you're zoomed in at max, and the camera follows the PC's side, so you see what's to the left/right of the character, instead of front, so I'm always using the keyboard to pan the camera left/right to see up ahead. And being able to look up ahead with wsad just feels like cheating.

The text is tiny it strains my eyes, and I don't like how small everything is on normal gaming laptop, so I feel that BG1+2 actually looks nicer than this one. I've always preferred the old graphics anyway. They do look breathtaking though, in cutscenes, and in Youtube videos where you can see someone ran it on a 25+ screen with all details on, but with high details but shadows turned off, it doesn't look that good on my PC. I do prefer isometric graphics though, so I would pick PoE/Kingmaker style of graphics over DOS.

Otherwise the combat is fun, not counting the bugs, although I'm not a fan of adding surface effects to the game (I haven't used yet barrelmancy or dipping weapons into surface effects, so I have no idea how much it makes the fights easier, but so far 2 wizards with sleep+ray of frost cantrip (which makes enemies go prone 98% time, because it creates a sheet of ice underneath them), 1 rogue (dual-wielding doesn't apply any penalties, so everyone can dualwield and have 2d6+Dex modifier damage per round in melee) and a cleric are easy. I haven't even tried using grease+firebolt yet, that would probably be even more OP. Adding high ground/low ground that affects your targetting chances is interesting and I do like it, but at the same time it's a pity that you have a lower casting chance just because you aren't standing higher.

I love the voice acting, I'm not a fan of how Larian overutilizes Irish/Scottish/cockney accents since they don't fit how I think the races actually speak (esp. since they didn't have them in BG), but I like the party's VOs.

I feel the party are jerks, I would prefer if they were nice, but someone was saying that supposedly you get 3 evil companions from the start to test them (+2 neutral/good), but I feel like that unless they actually rework the area, it will be the same at launch and the first two companions you come across, are evil.

All in all, it feels like a DOS game. It's commendable though, that characters can react to your race, and if you play a Drow, you get really different reactioins then if you play a good-aligned race.
To directly answer the topic title how I feel about BG3 based on YT clips, screens and people talking about it:

Its the most appealing, most stunning and intriguing genuine CRPG love letter in which Larian did their very best. In a setting I utterly despise (Post 4th Ed. Forgotten Realms) with a main villain (or main villain theme) I always hated and tried to waltz through as fast as possible if appearing in a sub-plot in either CRPG or on the Table to go back to the good non-Illithid stuff.

TL/DR: Conflicted ;)
avatar
Green_Hilltop: I don't like the Larian style dialogues, where you are pushed into making choices without being given enough information, and being given a series of questions but only being able to pick one. Unlike in IE games, where you could ask/pick whatever you wanted, and you would never miss out on obvious questions or being able to ask/talk about more topics unless you picked something that would end the conversation or aggravate the person.

For example you when you meet cultists, they are looking for someone, but you are unable to ask why - you can only tell them where to find X or not. I think this is a crucial point everyone would think of asking.

I'm not a fan of the camera, it's absolutely atrocious. Edge panning doesn't work at the moment, although that might be a bug, so you can't even drag the camera around so it's easier to move around - it currently works just like in DOS1 but without edge panning, you can't angle the camera or up, so you feel like you're missing a part of the picture when you're zoomed in at max, and the camera follows the PC's side, so you see what's to the left/right of the character, instead of front, so I'm always using the keyboard to pan the camera left/right to see up ahead. And being able to look up ahead with wsad just feels like cheating.

The text is tiny it strains my eyes, and I don't like how small everything is on normal gaming laptop, so I feel that BG1+2 actually looks nicer than this one. I've always preferred the old graphics anyway. They do look breathtaking though, in cutscenes, and in Youtube videos where you can see someone ran it on a 25+ screen with all details on, but with high details but shadows turned off, it doesn't look that good on my PC. I do prefer isometric graphics though, so I would pick PoE/Kingmaker style of graphics over DOS.

Otherwise the combat is fun, not counting the bugs, although I'm not a fan of adding surface effects to the game (I haven't used yet barrelmancy or dipping weapons into surface effects, so I have no idea how much it makes the fights easier, but so far 2 wizards with sleep+ray of frost cantrip (which makes enemies go prone 98% time, because it creates a sheet of ice underneath them), 1 rogue (dual-wielding doesn't apply any penalties, so everyone can dualwield and have 2d6+Dex modifier damage per round in melee) and a cleric are easy. I haven't even tried using grease+firebolt yet, that would probably be even more OP. Adding high ground/low ground that affects your targetting chances is interesting and I do like it, but at the same time it's a pity that you have a lower casting chance just because you aren't standing higher.

I love the voice acting, I'm not a fan of how Larian overutilizes Irish/Scottish/cockney accents since they don't fit how I think the races actually speak (esp. since they didn't have them in BG), but I like the party's VOs.

I feel the party are jerks, I would prefer if they were nice, but someone was saying that supposedly you get 3 evil companions from the start to test them (+2 neutral/good), but I feel like that unless they actually rework the area, it will be the same at launch and the first two companions you come across, are evil.

All in all, it feels like a DOS game. It's commendable though, that characters can react to your race, and if you play a Drow, you get really different reactioins then if you play a good-aligned race.
I have passed, and thankfully i'd say, the money for BG went towards Shadow Empire and belief it or not, this is a 4x that satisfies my rpg needs on so many levels more then any regular rpg could ever achieve... Its the only game i've been running this past month and that says a lot if you know how irregular i usually experience my games.. anyways, your experience... I did enjoy DOS for a couple of hours but i found it pretty elementary on other levels. The reason i was pretty much surprised with the choice for them and a dnd styled game... bg 3 nonetheless.... I would have hired bioware.... just saying .. ;)
Post edited November 01, 2020 by Radiance1979
Having only read a few things about it here and there (i.e., I know it's a thing that is currently under development), I don't have a strong feeling about it. Larian makes pretty good games from what I recall, so I'm sure it'll be fine to play. But the fact that it's BALDUR'S GATE III doesn't move me much since the Forgotten Realms lore/setting isn't something I've ever found very interesting.
I feel like i will not be playing it for many years to come - due to the idiotic download size and the system requirements that i simply cannot afford to meet yet.
Post edited November 02, 2020 by Sachys
The worlds of D&D have provided some of the most enjoyable moments in my life. I don't look deeply into one ruleset over the other. I play games for the fun factor and if it's fun, then I can usually live with some of the less than desirable quirks.

I love reading fantasy/sci-fi books (2000+ books on Kindle and counting), so playing any PC game based on similar themes is an easy temptation for me.

That being said, only thing that turns me off is a day one buggy release. I did QA work a good portion of my life. :)

I own both DOS and DOS:2, so far only played part of DOS and love the game so far. If BG3 gets the same level of quality treatment, then I'll likely get it at some point. Too much backlog of games to make a rush to the checkout for now.

BUT with a very very few exceptions, I do NOT like to purchase games while they are in the "In Dev" stage.

Plus I have to admit, as others have mentioned, that download size is rather intimidating. I mean that's like 30+ 4gb files to download and hoping none fail the integrity check. Not to mention if the installation failed even halfway through...shudders.

If there was a demo, i'd try it. But damn, I can only imagine even the demo would be a huge download lol.
.
Post edited November 02, 2020 by gog2002x
Aside of the grievances that have already been aired...

Honestly, it just looks like the Art Team was just extra and demanded to cram far too much detail into the game.

While the UX is [attached images] a busy eyesore.
Attachments: