It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
P1na: "Should"? No. I see no reason for that.

"May, provided it makes sense in context"? Sure. I see no reason for removing that.
Seconded. And also:
avatar
CharlesGrey: Well, the Horror genre has all kinds of sub-genres. Some stories ( films, games etc. ) are simply meant to scare you, others gross you out, and then others make you uncomfortable via ( subtle ) psychological Horror. Or sometimes it's a mix of all these things.

I don't think there should be taboos in art ( and that includes films, games or other forms of story-telling ). It's up to you, as the viewer, to decide what you enjoy watching and what kind of story you'd rather avoid.

It's also a matter of how the author or director handles a controversial theme such as rape. That is, whether it's only added for shock value ( and a cheap way for some extra media attention ) or whether it's a meaningful addition to the story and character development.
Although I might add, that regarding the last paragraph, the question of "shock value" or "meaningful plot/story/mood element" is often hard to answer. The answer is in the eye of the beholder. There might be people who see a rape scene as immensely adding to the mood of a story, while they find a grossly detailed eviscerating scene blunt and "just for show". Other people might see it the other way around.
avatar
Johnmourby: Alien vs Predator
avatar
Fenixp: Funny you'd mention a game based on H. R. Giger's work :-P
avatar
Johnmourby: The other reason why I don't think rape and horror belong together is because it's trivialising the subject matter. Using it as shock fodder when really as a subject matter it deserves to be treated as more than just "entertainment". If your movie or book is trying to say something meaningful go ahead. But just having it there to be shocking is kinda offensive.
avatar
Fenixp: No, the whole 'everybody should self-censor' approach is bullshit. As long as rape is part of society as we know it, as long as that issue is not going away, we need to use it in art. We need to keep it in everybody's attention, and we need to repeatedly show how horrible it is - in horror, in drama, anywhere it fits. The worst thing you can ever do is to sweep the entire issue under the rug and say "Yeah, it's triviliazing subject matter" - no, it's making the subject matter be seen and discussed. What do you think is the point of many works of art in the first place, people indulging in them without giving them a second thought?
I'm not sure what you're getting at here. I think rape scenes can be expectable if it isn't just there for shock. But the thing is it can be trivialised and that, to me, is wrong.
Anything is permissible in fiction. If it works in context then use it. Enforcing a taboo is restrictive to creative freedom.

If it aint your cup of tea then that's your preference.

Whether or not its any good then is up to the viewer/reader/player
avatar
Johnmourby: I'm not sure what you're getting at here. I think rape scenes can be expectable if it isn't just there for shock. But the thing is it can be trivialised and that, to me, is wrong.
I'm trying to say that a lot of horror fiction stands on shocking the audience. If rape can be used to shock the audience and it does, good - it's not cheapening the matter, it's playing with expectations of the audience. I'm also trying to say that "cheapening the matter" is such a broad and personal perspective that using it as a general term against usage of a storytelling element tends to be bad - define, how does it cheapen the matter? If a person viewing horror movie sees rape and is shocked by seeing rape, is rape cheapened in his eyes? I don't think so, quite the contrary.

Let's take it further tho, where can rape be used? Because, you see, there is rape and there is rape - some time ago, I was playing a mod to Neverwinter Nights which used a rape scene straight off the bat. The female who wrote it made sure to include all the politically correct bits - say it was horrible for the PC and whatnot - nonetheless, it was written in an extremely suggestive and ... Detailed manner. Actually, let's take it even further - porn movies. Yes, porn's media too. Not sure about art, but whatever, not the point. Rape seems to be extremely common female fantasy, very likely far more common than a male fantasy of raping a female. I won't go into psychology of the thing because I have only put a small amount of research into the matter, nonetheless, I find rape porn extremely gross and distasteful. Well, most of females I have known in my life sure didn't (I should probably point out that I gravitate towards strong, dominant women, my knowledge is probably slightly skewed). In other words, is it wrong that a form of art could show a very common fantasy? Is it triviliazing the matter, or is it mirroring realities around us? As far as I'm concerned, all art should be the latter - it should reflect society, both its reality and its dreams. And if it's making someone uncomfortable? That's good, because it'll make said someone think, research, discuss and find out why. Or it'll just make said someone a judgemental bastard. *Sigh*, who am I kidding, the latter happens a lot more.
high rated
avatar
Johnmourby: If I may site present, Look at the best horror games; Amnesia, Alien vs Predator, Resident Evil, System shock 2, Doom 3, Thief, Alone in the Dark. Would any of these games have been made better by long, gruesome rape scenes?
Fun fact: The above game is full of alien creatures that rape your mouth and even impregnate you. ;-)
Post edited May 10, 2015 by Geralt_of_Rivia
avatar
CharlesGrey: Well, the Horror genre has all kinds of sub-genres. Some stories ( films, games etc. ) are simply meant to scare you, others gross you out, and then others make you uncomfortable via ( subtle ) psychological Horror. Or sometimes it's a mix of all these things.

I don't think there should be taboos in art ( and that includes films, games or other forms of story-telling ). It's up to you, as the viewer, to decide what you enjoy watching and what kind of story you'd rather avoid.

It's also a matter of how the author or director handles a controversial theme such as rape. That is, whether it's only added for shock value ( and a cheap way for some extra media attention ) or whether it's a meaningful addition to the story and character development.
+1 for putting it better than I

Personal Preference:

Body horror makes me super queasy. Like Cronnenberg stuff is something I don't really like to watch. Its shot really really well but makes me feel a sick. Videodrome was not an easy watch for me.

That being said I would never not want a creator to have as many tools and plot devices at their disposal simply because I did not fancy certain elements. Same goes for rape in fiction.
Post edited May 10, 2015 by ScotchMonkey
Horror should be free of rape. And killing. And monsters and evil. And disease both mental or physical. And the apocalypse.
Did I forget any nasty stuff? If not, have fun being scared!
I firmly believe that no subject should be "banned" from exploring it in art (books, music, games, etc.). Art needs to be free, needs to be able to break taboos, to provide a new perspective, to change our minds.

We may disagree with the way how one specific work depicts a given subject, especially if the subject is a very real issue that often leaves deep wounds, such as rape. But it's also possible to use it in a way that broadens our perspective, that lets us understand things a bit better. And you can't have the latter without also allowing the crap.

Horror movies are certainly a medium where rape is often just used as an embellishment or as a "gore" feature. But there are also works like "Deadgirl" which positively surprised me in the way how they handled the subject.

If you don't like horror movies that include rape scenes, that's absolutely fine. Don't watch them, or - if you do watch them - voice your discontent. But I'd stay away from sweeping statements like "horror shouldn't contain subject X", or calls for censorship (be it authoritative or self-inflicted).

If there's a movie that glorifies rape, or that revels in its depiction, then I will probably condemn this movie with very strong words. What I won't do, though, is calling for it to be banned, or claiming that the subject shouldn't be used at all. We need our minds to be free. Free minds obviously produce a lot of crap, but then we call them out on that.
Stupid question.No artist should censor themselfs.
avatar
Johnmourby: Rape isn't scary, or creepy, or spooky it's just really horrible.
Murder isn't scary, or creepy, or spooky it's just really horrible. I'm sure most people would agree that murdering someone is worse than raping him. Yet you seem to accept murder as a normal part of horror. Why is that?
avatar
Strijkbout: Answer: no.

Maybe you should discuss this with your psychiatrist and not on a public forum.
This poster needs to read some Berserk. Good healthy fiction for the whole family.
Yes, if it benefits the story.

Disclaimer: Usually it doesn't because it's used as cheap drama.
avatar
Johnmourby: Rape isn't scary, or creepy, or spooky it's just really horrible.
By that logic what can horror stories do? Everything bad is horrible, that's what makes it scary. Being killed is horrible, being tortured is horrible, being driven to insanity is horrible, losing control over your actions is horrible, losing the grip on reality is horrible. Do you notice something about the word "horrible"? It's the adjective form of "horror".
avatar
Johnmourby: The other reason why I don't think rape and horror belong together is because it's trivialising the subject matter.
How? And if so, then why is the horror genre not also trivialising all the things I listed above?
avatar
Psyringe: We may disagree with the way how one specific work depicts a given subject, especially if the subject is a very real issue that often leaves deep wounds, such as rape. But it's also possible to use it in a way that broadens our perspective, that lets us understand things a bit better. And you can't have the latter without also allowing the crap.
...
If there's a movie that glorifies rape, or that revels in its depiction, then I will probably condemn this movie with very strong words. What I won't do, though, is calling for it to be banned, or claiming that the subject shouldn't be used at all. We need our minds to be free. Free minds obviously produce a lot of crap, but then we call them out on that.
This.
Post edited May 10, 2015 by F4LL0UT
high rated
What about Evil Dead when she gets raped by a tree?

Rosemary's Baby; without rape there the movie has no plot.