rgnrk: Probably because all the moaning and whining about the lack of achievements of late might make gog rethink or reject games the could otherwise be here without them.
Ancient-Red-Dragon: It's not "moaning and whining" to complain about being treated like second-class citizens by being sold a sub-par/feature-removed version of a game, even though we have to pay the same real money to buy it as do customers on another platform who get a superior version just because the devs happen to show them favoritism and not to care about treating GOG customers worse.
GOG should indeed stop selling games that don't have Achievement parity with Steam. GOG already refuses to sell games from devs that don't have update parity with Steam, and GOG often de-lists such games from the GOG catalogue when the devs admit they aren't going to bother to give the GOG version update parity.
It's a double standard on GOG's part not to likewise insist on feature parity (at least so far as features that the GOG platform is able to offer), including Achievements. And the victims of that double standard are the GOG customers.
The best thing GOG could do is to abandon that double standard, and insist upon/demand that devs who can't be bothered to give their GOG games feature parity are not allowed to be sold on GOG.
You are forgetting that steam customers are the ones, most of the time, buying a substandard drmd version of the game. As you don't care about drm-free at all, you should be buying games on steam instead of here. You would be happier and we wouldn't have a drm advocate trying to dictate what games we should have. Games linked to a store client are not drm-free as far as I'm concerned.
rgnrk: Probably because all the moaning and whining about the lack of achievements of late might make gog rethink or reject games the could otherwise be here without them. And being game preservation my main concern, I don't care one tiny little bit about game achievements artificially made through store architectures that won't stand the test of time and are, arguably, moot for drm-free games that will survive the demise of such stores.
MightyPinecone: I can understand the argument for game preservation and wanting games to be here at all being more important then getting games with achievements. It's more important to me too (particularly since I use Linux and thus cannot use achievements to begin with). But I don't understand the argument that it is straight up positive when games that have achievements on Steam don't get them here.
Yes, I agree with you, as I don't actually mind galaxy achievements at all; I don't use galaxy. My point was just to showcase why some people could be bothered by all this new upcoming achievement demands and its possible unfortunate ramifications.