Posted September 09, 2016
I say treat it like a normal game, just like Trenton told me. Until further notice. I expect events will be obvious if we should actually take it elsewhere. I confess however that due to lack of significant reads I am quite torn who to vote.
trentonlf: ... and around the kill there were only human tracks meaning that it was a werewolf that changed back to human and left no tracks. Thanks, that's a good observation.
Bookwyrm627: ...because anyone that has watched more than two games that had Drealmer in them would be aware of his favorite Day 1 vote? I'm calling BS on this. Get real... that was the smoke so of course it was half bullshit / half truth. I'm currently assuming there's no No Lynch fire in Drealmer's belly. Disclaimer: I reserve the right to change my mind later blah blah...
Heh... I'm not there yet.
I hadn't even understood that was the question... 0_o [goes re-read]
If you say so... ;)
I agree on the other sentiment. It's certainly the messiest D1 I've ever... oh wait...
yogsloth: That said, I think we're on the right track. Brasas is doing a great job compiling flavor roles - except, of course, for his own: Missed this last time. I'm the horses guy and melancholy (in RP) and I'm confused as hell (in RL). Get it now?
Fair point however that I let the joke take precedence over clarity for you all. It was funny for me at least...
cristigale: Thus the questions about why you think it's not just strategically beneficial sometimes, which I agree, but why you think Drealmer would put it in play. There's a pretty obvious response to that, it just seems to me that instead you're spinning towards saying you never said something you pretty clearly seem to have said, even in jest. [finished re-read] Bler, to me it's distilled here. This does not look like: "why did you propose it?". It looks like: "why do you think No Lynch is good right here, right now?"
I'm not one to throw rocks over being a sneakily implicit innuendo asshole. I actually got you as the only slight town lean so far because of how you pushed me (being generically helpful I read neutral - WIFOM). But if there's one thing I do alot around this forum is argue. And from that angle, your argument is a logical stretch IMO.
You are asking why did I propose IT. Implying "it" means actual in this specific context No Lynch Advocacy. I say it was half-baked posturing. And you insist why did I really believe IT?
Disclaimer: I am still seeing tension on the No Lynch issue and reserve the right to vote however I feel is best for us. Some of the pressure over this topic, coming so late after IMO that went nowehere, strikes me as setting me up. Yeah, me paranoid. Duh...
Shit, this reminds me of something I saw from Yogs... [looks for it]
I still don't. You're so good with the littl'uns Eric, why don't you explain it like I'm a 5 year old. Pretty please?
What did voting stanari have to do with her stance over STU, STF or whatever we are calling it now? I remember it more as part of No Lynch mess... a mess I acknowledge I caused, and regret more and more... and fuck if that don't hurt to say. I like being active and fast reaction in these games, but it sucks that so many get left behind.
Yes, I do like my puns. Yes, I am kind of an asshole. Or am I? I like to believe I'm copying it from you by the way :P
@all
Morning post over. Off to work. Might be able to connect during the day today.


Heh... I'm not there yet.
I hadn't even understood that was the question... 0_o [goes re-read]
If you say so... ;)
I agree on the other sentiment. It's certainly the messiest D1 I've ever... oh wait...

Fair point however that I let the joke take precedence over clarity for you all. It was funny for me at least...

I'm not one to throw rocks over being a sneakily implicit innuendo asshole. I actually got you as the only slight town lean so far because of how you pushed me (being generically helpful I read neutral - WIFOM). But if there's one thing I do alot around this forum is argue. And from that angle, your argument is a logical stretch IMO.
You are asking why did I propose IT. Implying "it" means actual in this specific context No Lynch Advocacy. I say it was half-baked posturing. And you insist why did I really believe IT?
Disclaimer: I am still seeing tension on the No Lynch issue and reserve the right to vote however I feel is best for us. Some of the pressure over this topic, coming so late after IMO that went nowehere, strikes me as setting me up. Yeah, me paranoid. Duh...
Shit, this reminds me of something I saw from Yogs... [looks for it]
I still don't. You're so good with the littl'uns Eric, why don't you explain it like I'm a 5 year old. Pretty please?
What did voting stanari have to do with her stance over STU, STF or whatever we are calling it now? I remember it more as part of No Lynch mess... a mess I acknowledge I caused, and regret more and more... and fuck if that don't hurt to say. I like being active and fast reaction in these games, but it sucks that so many get left behind.
Yes, I do like my puns. Yes, I am kind of an asshole. Or am I? I like to believe I'm copying it from you by the way :P
@all
Morning post over. Off to work. Might be able to connect during the day today.