slurredprey: While the price may be arguably a bit too much, this is undoubtedly a good thing. Xbox is one of the more consumer-friendly AAA studios, with consistently good titles and support to smaller studios for which they publish games, whereas Activision-Blizzard is the polar opposite, lootboxes and annoying, unnecessary micro-transactions and cash-grabby annual copy-pasted games (you know which franchise I'm talking about). Not to mention the fact that their anti-employee practises with several cases of workplace harassment popping up recently.
Dark_art_: After the agressive monetization of Minecraft, I wouldn't hold my breath they will not do the same with these behemoth aquisitions.
tag+: And that folks, is the way S̶p̶y̶w̶a̶r̶e̶ (Oopsy!) Telemetry (TM) + your customers doing the beta tester work can produce 70B to acquire Activision-Blizzard.
Dark_art_: I seem to recall reading somewhere, sometime that Microsoft was the biggest raw data miner, even above Google.
Krogan32: Remember when the US government broke up Microsoft back in 2000 for becoming dominating in the computer marketplace? Yeah, they won't allow MS to buy Acti-Blizz because it will end the same way with MS becoming the dominating force in the computer games marketplace.
Dark_art_: Remember the issues Microsoft had when because Office and Internet Explorer?
These are other times and most od these issues can be countered somehow, look at Android...
Mix telemetry + monetization + default uninstallable programs + ecosystem + friendly low monthly rent payments and welcome to their innocent & shy fair play competition...
The really good thing is M$ embrace the open source thing... who don't: They are monetizing the github source code while the creators... keep coding and uploading for free...
Challenging times for people not living on the $billions world.