Posted April 28, 2016
CharlesGrey: Not sure what your point is... Steam doesn't have "all" movies, despite requiring you to pay per movie, and despite the time limited license. So Prime still sounds like a far superior offer.
And if I really wanted to watch those few specific movies available via Steam, but not on Amazon Prime -- well, I just checked, and most of them are available as second-hand DVDs at a lower price than the Steam rental fee.
synfresh: You're only bitching about it because it's Valve. Nobody complains that Amazon/Vudu/Name a service also does rentals. Rentals bring in a couple billion per year, Valve just wants another revenue stream. I really don't see what the big deal is, it's not like anyone here is going to rent anyway. Like I said, people do rentals all the time, as evidenced whenever I walk into my grocery store and there are 3-4 people standing in line at the Redbox. And if I really wanted to watch those few specific movies available via Steam, but not on Amazon Prime -- well, I just checked, and most of them are available as second-hand DVDs at a lower price than the Steam rental fee.
CharlesGrey points out some things that make the Steam service unattractive to them.
You offer a rebuttal.
CharlesGrey points out that your counter-argument is irrelevant and applies to streaming services in general.
You launch a personal attack.
The only person 'bitching' is you. If you can't handle people saying 'Eh, not for me thanks' you should go take a nap or something until you can handle disagreement like a grownup.
Post edited April 28, 2016 by Gilozard