It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
darthspudius: He might be a fuck wit and an idiot, but he is our fuck wit and idiot!
avatar
Tauto: Message received you love him,didn't know you two were in love.
I knew I loved you before I met you.
avatar
darthspudius: Spot on... :D
avatar
Tauto: Spot on,what?
Its both.......
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/one_word_at_a_time_1/page255
is it me or is the above topic full of scammer accounts and "new users"?
avatar
dick1982: https://www.gog.com/forum/general/one_word_at_a_time_1/page255
is it me or is the above topic full of scammer accounts and "new users"?
as different users have different page settings its not that useful to link only a page, give us some post numbers
Post edited October 07, 2015 by apehater
avatar
dick1982: https://www.gog.com/forum/general/one_word_at_a_time_1/page255
is it me or is the above topic full of scammer accounts and "new users"?
avatar
apehater: as different users have different page settings its not that useful to link only a page, give us some post numbers
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/one_word_at_a_time_1/post2544
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/one_word_at_a_time_1/post2545
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/one_word_at_a_time_1/post2546

above are posted at almost the same time?

https://www.gog.com/forum/general/one_word_at_a_time_1/post2550
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/one_word_at_a_time_1/post2549
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/one_word_at_a_time_1/post2552
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/one_word_at_a_time_1/post2553

and some other suspects and swatkat/nes/ex-tauto

Gog8's rep is un-naturally high and created during the summer sale. EDIT: oh Gog8 is nes...
Post edited October 07, 2015 by dick1982
avatar
dick1982: ... Gog8 is nes...
thanks, i don't know if gog8 is nes, but its a confirmed scammer
low rated
I can vouch for Heres.MyAccount being legit.
Post edited October 08, 2015 by ZFR
That thread seems like a fake rep forge -_-'
Post edited October 07, 2015 by phaolo
avatar
ZFR: *snip*
Even without you vouching for it, lumping the user who created that thread with the rest was a baseless suspicion. A quick forum search clearly shows that s/he is an active community member with many posts including in the sub-forums as well.

I was going to reply earlier but I wanted to keep a legit forum goer's username out of this thread, since it doesn't even merit any discussion for atleast that account. Just because there is no avatar or forum tag, it doesn't automatically make it a suspicious alt. This is why I personally make an effort to not throw around accusations based on assumptions without any proper context.
avatar
stg83: lumping the user who created that thread
Woah, I didn't even realize he's the thread creator.
I've edited my post to remove his username from here in any case.
avatar
ZFR: Woah, I didn't even realize he's the thread creator.
I've edited my post to remove his username from here in any case.
That is the first thing I noticed, so its obvious that the thread creator is going to be active there. ;)
hm. did i just lose 5 rep for posting that, or did my "women in the kitchen" post do that???
avatar
dick1982: hm. did i just lose 5 rep for posting that, or did my "women in the kitchen" post do that???
Post the "woman in the kitchen" thing in the #gamergate thread and see what happens...
avatar
dick1982: hm. did i just lose 5 rep for posting that, or did my "women in the kitchen" post do that???
avatar
toxicTom: Post the "woman in the kitchen" thing in the #gamergate thread and see what happens...
no way. they don't need more fuel for bloggerific drama.
avatar
dick1982: no way. they don't need more fuel for bloggerific drama.
Also they seem to have some rep-multiplier attached to the thread, but only to the [-1]-button.
Post edited October 07, 2015 by toxicTom