Pangaea666: Still don't get why you would use Alex Jones for information about... anything.
If the information is accurate, then who the hell cares?
I post an article about
XYZ and people will say he's discredited;
Then I pull up
THE EXACT SAME ARTICLE AND INFORMATION from another source like FoxNews, Wall Street Journal or
NPR and no one calls them discredited. This is a double standard. 95% of the time I see often everything they talk about is news in regards to other sources and putting it in perspective of what's going on, not them making up stuff and conjuring conspiracies out of thin air.
Pangaea666: As for current "conspiracies", if it can be called that, you have the leaks about Clinton. How she is BFF with Wall Street, how she has "one public policy and one private", how she's in love with TTIP and other equally horrible trade deals (which has very little to do with free or trade or agreements, but more with investor rights, superseding nationstates). These are real and very serious issues, that ought to have more cover. I'd recommend to focus on stories like that instead, and from better sources than the bat-shit crazy Alex Jones and Co.
The current topic I was replying to was in regards to Haiti and also Hurricane Matthew.
Besides I'm not here to spam
every article as they come, regardless if people want to take notice or not, telling about the latest leaks/information, or that Hillary turned in underwear for $2 per pair as a tax writeoff just isn't going to be that useful.