Posted December 18, 2016
RWarehall: Scroll up!
Everyone's definition of spam is different, but stalking a thread repeating the same basic thing over and over (while basically ignoring anything anyone else is saying) constitutes spam in my book. It's not like lazydog's point has changed at all. It's pretty easy to follow.
"I don't think Infowars is real news. Stop it. I'm reporting you. Everyone hates you anyway. Go away."
How many posts of this does it take to constitute spam in your book?
His point is the same, but at least he's arguing it intelligently. I can respect that. Everyone's definition of spam is different, but stalking a thread repeating the same basic thing over and over (while basically ignoring anything anyone else is saying) constitutes spam in my book. It's not like lazydog's point has changed at all. It's pretty easy to follow.
"I don't think Infowars is real news. Stop it. I'm reporting you. Everyone hates you anyway. Go away."
How many posts of this does it take to constitute spam in your book?
rctvb32 isn't arguing anything, he's just posting links and going away until he comes back to post more. As I said before, if there's actual discussion about the topic with active interest, it ceases to be spam. I've yet to see that for this thread, though.
It would be different if he were repeating that exact same phrase over and over again without explaining himself.