It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
apehater: white chocolate is an invention of kkk! if you buy it, you support the kkk!
avatar
Venita: Krazy Kit Kats?
no! Krazy Kit Kats is the name of the strip club, that tinyE is running in us underground.
Post edited April 06, 2016 by apehater
I quite doubt that white is chocolate chocolate. As far as I know, white is a colour.
deleted
avatar
Venita: Are priests mages?
avatar
omega64: No.
exactly! priests like kids way too much, compared to mages.
Well, that's the same as asking how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck cloud chuck wood, in my league...
avatar
omega64: No.
avatar
apehater: exactly! priests like kids way too much, compared to mages.
Does that happen when they become priests or do they become priests due to that trait?
avatar
KingofGnG: Well, that's the same as asking how much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck cloud chuck wood, in my league...
He would chuck all the wood that a woodchuck could, if a woodchuck could chuck wood.
avatar
apehater: exactly! priests like kids way too much, compared to mages.
avatar
omega64: Does that happen when they become priests or do they become priests due to that trait?
how should i know? i'm not a priest
avatar
omega64: Does that happen when they become priests or do they become priests due to that trait?
avatar
apehater: how should i know? i'm not a priest
Liar.
avatar
nightcraw1er.488: No they are not. Preists can wear armour, and their "powers" come from divinitys. Spellcasters use the raw magic to manipulate the world, and hence can't wear armour.
avatar
Venita: That depends on the rules. You can take a white mage from Final Fantasy and see that they're wearing robes, or you can have a cleric from Darkest Dungeon who's armored.
Did you mean that the other way round? That seems to support what I was saying - Wizards = Robes, Priests = Armour.

There has to be some limitations on each type of character otherwise there is no character choice.
avatar
Venita: That depends on the rules.
avatar
Breja: Exactly. In Warhammer FRP the same armor rules apply to all magic users.
Thats madness then, why would anyone have a fully armoured warrior, that isn't also a super-powered mage?
Post edited April 06, 2016 by nightcraw1er.488
avatar
nightcraw1er.488: Thats madness then, why would anyone have a fully armoured warrior, that isn't also a super-powered mage?
The same rules apply to all magic users does not mean there is no penalty. It just means that whether you use arcane or divine or necromancy and whatever kind of magic, the armor penalty is the same.
avatar
nightcraw1er.488: Thats madness then, why would anyone have a fully armoured warrior, that isn't also a super-powered mage?
avatar
Breja: The same rules apply to all magic users does not mean there is no penalty. It just means that whether you use arcane or divine or necromancy and whatever kind of magic, the armor penalty is the same.
So, no-one would be a cleric then. The benefit of cleric in and is that you can combine some of magic with armour?
avatar
nightcraw1er.488: So, no-one would be a cleric then. The benefit of cleric in and is that you can combine some of magic with armour?
The "benefit" is a different list of spells and that divine magic is much safer to use. High level arcane magic is very dangerous, can easily cause chaotic manifestations and hurt the spellcaster. Or people around him. Or who knows what.

Anyway, there are no classes in WFRP the way there are in D&D, so there is no "cleric" the way you mean it. There is a multitude of professions, some entirely useless from a D&D players point of view - traders, ratcatchers, fishermen, miners etc. The point is they give you different skill sets, background and starting equipment. You may end up with a team of characters nothing like a traditional adventuring group from D&D at all, and that might well be half the fun.
It is not. Zero coco product of any kind.

And it is a hideous to boot.
Yes, and it's yummy! Then again, I like just about anything that has chocolate. (Although I do draw the line at any insect dipped in chocolate).
avatar
Matewis: White chocolate KitKats rule!!
Along with white chocolate Resse cups!
Post edited April 06, 2016 by docbear1975