adaliabooks: I can kind of get the importance of the symbol, but it does seem a little pointless in this context to persecute someone like Introversion for this.
I had no idea it was a protected symbol (though thinking about it Green Crosses are probably more common on First Aid and other similar items)
Green crosses mean that there's a medicinal marijuana dispensary around here.
The whole idea that in game things should be restricted this way would make more sense if they hadn't been ignoring the issue for decades. Most games I can remember when I was a kid had first aid packs that had that symbol on it.
Now, if they sell physical items with the symbol on it, that might be worth worrying about. But, most first aid kits have the symbol on it already and I doubt most of them actually have formal permission to do it.
Shadowstalker16: This headline will travel far and wide because people won't understand what it means. And ofc no-one writing articles are going to put descriptive headlines in. The actual harm done by this is minimal, but ''broke the Geneva Convention'' ought to bring in some confused people. Kinda sad to see them go through this shit after the gender roles controversy.
Right, technically this is a violation, but it's rather dishonest for anybody to think this is a big deal. A big deal would be going around in a warzone wearing the symbol while engaged in combat. That, would be a big deal, and that kind of thing is what this rule is supposed to prevent. That and people using the symbol as a way of getting around without being attacked.
Using it like this, just weakens the support there might be for the protection of the symbol.