It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Martek: It's time to convene a meeting and hash this out..
avatar
tinyE: I need to watch that again.
Ha...I knew even before clicking the link, it could only be that scene ;o)

I love AotKTs! :D
So, when is Book 5 being released?
The answer it's 42
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anwy2MPT5RE
high rated
avatar
GR00T: Lawyer or politician?
Lawyer gone into politics, lethal combo.
I know this is a joke, but I want to chase you down the street with a flamethrower for a few hours.
avatar
Lord_Kane: I know this is a joke, but I want to chase you down the street with a flamethrower for a few hours.
You ever try running with a flamethrower!? Man you're crazy!
A flamethrower could possibly be problematic, as it would only encourage such behavior as was recently exhibited by the party in question during the night also in question, in which incidents of an egregious (not to mention horrifyingly traumatic for those affected, as well as any and all bystanders who happened to be... well, standing by) atrocity of such epic proportions and on a scale comparable to that of the big bang, or even opening day of The Lion King.
avatar
Lord_Kane: I know this is a joke, but I want to chase you down the street with a flamethrower for a few hours.
avatar
tinyE: You ever try running with a flamethrower!? Man you're crazy!
THATS HALF THE FUN.
avatar
tinyE: You ever try running with a flamethrower!? Man you're crazy!
avatar
Lord_Kane: THATS HALF THE FUN.
Hmmmm, maybe I should give it another try.
Totally agree with OP. +1

How much longer can this go on? However, a solution - or rather, a way of discovering this half-truth - should have been initiated in a manner not withholding opinions not incapable of wider contents. What are we going to do about it?
avatar
HeresMyAccount: A flamethrower could possibly be problematic, as it would only encourage such behavior as was recently exhibited by the party in question during the night also in question, in which incidents of an egregious (not to mention horrifyingly traumatic for those affected, as well as any and all bystanders who happened to be... well, standing by) atrocity of such epic proportions and on a scale comparable to that of the big bang, or even opening day of The Lion King.
The relevance of bystanders is still an isuue in question, as collateral damage considerations have been appropriately addressed in the preliminary studies. The problematic nature of the flamethrower is, therefore, of necessity, of considerably less concern. Attempts at obfuscation of this by opposition blocs (unbiased as they may claim, which has yet to hold up to more rigorous examination) have markedly skewed preliminary results, leading to a call for further testing. Owing to the complications arising from collection of acceptable materials and highly suspect (although peer-reviewed,) methodology, this matter is under further scrutiny by various non-interest groups and non-affiliated third parties.
avatar
KasperHviid: Totally agree with OP. +1

How much longer can this go on? However, a solution - or rather, a way of discovering this half-truth - should have been initiated in a manner not withholding opinions not incapable of wider contents. What are we going to do about it?
In serious instances such as the one in question, involvment by non-partisan parties is indicated. Selection via committee of an ad hoc negotiating team must perforce be top prioirty. Resolution of the issue must, and will, be swift once all avenues of approach have been exhausted. Owing to the immediacy of the concerns such action would perforce be taken with all due process, not withstanding any statutes, laws, and precedent that may apply. The goal here is satisfactory closure, and it is felt that this is in part achievable through all-party round tables and a holistic approach with consideration towards tiered imperatives.
Testing is all well and good, but we can keep running tests until the cows come home, leave, come back, open a bed and breakfast, run for governor, and get ground into hamburger meat, but none of that will change the fact that what we really need is some good, thorough testing (especially in view of all the aforementioned preliminary results which, although not entirely unbiased, have been properly calibrated to the standard set by all appropriate organizations in conjunction with such practices), even though such testing would imply the necessity of a complete overhaul of the entire system, thereby compromising the security of the project, and requiring us to start over from scratch, flamethrowers or not!

EDIT: After noticing your latest post upon completion of my miraculously non-run-on previous sentence, I would like to add that your dedication to such a worthwhile (and of course I'm using that term very liberally) cause is quite commendable (or was that combustible? I always confuse the two in the context of flamethrowers); however, I do indeed believe that you focus too much on resolution, as it were, because after all, it's the journey, not the destination, that gives you blisters on your feet, and as for resolution, mine is currently (and might I add, nearly always) set to 1920x1080, and I'm perfectly content with it, which is not to say that I wouldn't welcome an upgrade were it presented to me free of charge, nor would I shun anyone who did present such an offer to me.
Post edited April 06, 2016 by HeresMyAccount
I assume this is a "Yes Minister" inspired post. Otherwise, you need to look it up, because you're way out of your league here.