It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
low rated
After playing a bunch of games from my GOG library, and some newer games, I wanted to bring this topic up for discussion. Obviously, this doesn't apply to all games, as there will always be gems and outliers, but this addresses the general feel I am getting from the industry.

I've started feeling that, while a ton of new shiny games are coming out, whenever I play them, I don't find myself getting invested in them like I do when I play Ultima IV, Doom, Wasteland or Duke Nukem 3D. As I think about it more and more, I've come to realise that what these games are missing (At least for me) is the personal touch of the designers and developers. When I play these older games, made by smaller teams, I get a strong feel for who the people who worked on the game were. Doom oozes heavy metal and Alien fandom, and really gives you a good idea of who Id Software were and what they liked. Duke Nukem 3D may be ultra-referential, but I feel like I know George Broussard a whole lot better after playing it (A nerdy kid who's into 80s action films, and all the silly, over-the-top goofyness that went with them).

It may seem like a stupid point, but to me, that's a big reason of why I play games. It's why I follow my favourite game developers and designers on twitter, and check frequently to see if they're working on something new. Every time I play their games, it feels like we're having this silent conversation. By simply playing the game, I am experiencing a piece of that person, and that makes the game more memorable than all the flashy graphics in the world.
low rated
avatar
Mustafa_Khaled: After playing a bunch of games from my GOG library, and some newer games, I wanted to bring this topic up for discussion. Obviously, this doesn't apply to all games, as there will always be gems and outliers, but this addresses the general feel I am getting from the industry.

I've started feeling that, while a ton of new shiny games are coming out, whenever I play them, I don't find myself getting invested in them like I do when I play Ultima IV, Doom, Wasteland or Duke Nukem 3D. As I think about it more and more, I've come to realise that what these games are missing (At least for me) is the personal touch of the designers and developers. When I play these older games, made by smaller teams, I get a strong feel for who the people who worked on the game were. Doom oozes heavy metal and Alien fandom, and really gives you a good idea of who Id Software were and what they liked. Duke Nukem 3D may be ultra-referential, but I feel like I know George Broussard a whole lot better after playing it (A nerdy kid who's into 80s action films, and all the silly, over-the-top goofyness that went with them).

It may seem like a stupid point, but to me, that's a big reason of why I play games. It's why I follow my favourite game developers and designers on twitter, and check frequently to see if they're working on something new. Every time I play their games, it feels like we're having this silent conversation. By simply playing the game, I am experiencing a piece of that person, and that makes the game more memorable than all the flashy graphics in the world.
you signed up to post this?
why not try some of the games on offer here - some are even free.
low rated
Yep, they have. For instance,when Ubi bought out New world Computing a lot of great games were lost or should I say (futuristic games were lost) to greed. Also,lost some great ideas in games from Betrayal at Krondor and Planet's Edge and many more bought out by the greedy that never improved the games or ideas but let them rot.
low rated
avatar
Mustafa_Khaled:
Yes, much of the current AAA space is quite generic and sadly a waste of time.
avatar
Mustafa_Khaled: After playing a bunch of games from my GOG library,
Your profile says otherwise. Are you a bot?
avatar
Dark_art_: Your profile says otherwise. Are you a bot?
Do you not know that the profile activity only works if you use Galaxy, and it even says so right there? If I had a public profile, it would also show zero activity, even though that's not even slightly accurate. Can you figure out why?
avatar
eric5h5: Do you not know that the profile activity only works if you use Galaxy, and it even says so right there? If I had a public profile, it would also show zero activity, even though that's not even slightly accurate. Can you figure out why?
The number of games owned is public, regarding the privacy settings or if you play offline like I do, isn't it?


Edit: Add pic for clarity
Attachments:
Post edited July 25, 2019 by Dark_art_
avatar
Mustafa_Khaled: I've started feeling that, while a ton of new shiny games are coming out, whenever I play them, I don't find myself getting invested in them like I do when I play Ultima IV, Doom, Wasteland or Duke Nukem 3D.
My personal take on it:
That's simply because you aren't the same person that you were when you played these games originally.

New games aren't really worse than their 20+ years old predecessors (players of today wouldn't play them, if they were objectively bad)(*)...but you simply aren't as naive, inexperienced, and/or as easy to impress anymore as you were back then. You don't feel that "sense of wonder" anymore, that you felt 20+ years ago.

New games are mostly reiterated ideas from the past. And after some years of playing all kinds of different games, you have quite literally seen it all.
So, "the ever same old wine that's getting sold today in new wineskins" isn't that convincing anymore.

(*) I know a lot of people will disagree with that.
To those people I say: simply try to put yourself into the shoes of someone who is today 12 to 25 years old (or in whatever age you were, when you discovered video games as a hobby)...someone who has no "hands-on" experience with the 20+ years old games, that you loved so much, when you were their age...if you manage to do that, and if you're able to be honest to yourself, you'll have to admit, that I'm right.
If you could simply erase your 20+ years of gaming experience and if you could start gaming with only what modern games have to offer on a "tabula rasa" - you would love the exact games, that you mock now as inferior, soul-less, cash-grabs. And you wouldn't miss a thing.
avatar
Dark_art_: Your profile says otherwise. Are you a bot?
avatar
eric5h5: Do you not know that the profile activity only works if you use Galaxy, and it even says so right there? If I had a public profile, it would also show zero activity, even though that's not even slightly accurate. Can you figure out why?
The number of games owned doesn't come from Galaxy. This information is stored by Gog when you buy a game, of course.
I'm fairly sure you can find plenty of people in this forum who have open profiles with hundreds of games owned, yet zero activity due to not using Galaxy. You would see it in your own profile if it were open.
I agree with some AAA titles having no soul.

There are plenty of indie games that are worthwhile though.
I think there are good games and bad games in every era and thinking one era was overall "better" is largely nostalgia goggles.
We can apply the same thought to film, music, tv etc

We all grow jaded and tired of the modern trends that don't quite hit home with what we grew up with/loved.

There's plenty of stuff coming out each week, just sometimes it's harder to find or the press/stores do an awful job of portraying the game.

Islanders
Blazing Chrome
Amid Evil
Kingdom Come Deliverance
Bloodstained
all filled with sould, all with active feeds from their creators.

We can't keep ourselves locked into the past and following the same people while expecting it to stay fresh and engaging. Metallica being a prime example of even the good get dull, most of the time
Small development teams and that make the games that they want to make and pour their heart and soul into their games still exist in the form of indie developers. I would avoid any big-budget, AAA game, made by hundreds of people. Any game would lose its personality when so many people get involved.
Speaking of .... soul - Dark Souls is a relatively new game and one of the best ever made and ditto Bloodborne. Take a look at a list of worst games ever made and many will be from 10, 20, or 30 years ago. Plenty of shit games today but also plenty of shit games from years past. Plenty of good modern AAA games like Horizon Zero Dawn, Assassin's Creed Odyssey, Doom (2016), Witcher 3, Fallout 3 and 4 and NV. Plenty of indies like The Witness, Braid, Fez, Fire Watch, Minecraft, and Proteus.

Games are still great today - it's just you that are getting old and conservative.
Very short answer: no.
Games didn't lose their souls, maybe one can get this impression because corporate executives now impose their will over the actual designers; everybody knows that, by nature, executives have no soul - here's where the misconception comes from!
:P