So I had started typing this yesterday (or the day before ? my timeline is a bit wibbly wobbly this weekspace).
JoeSapphire: what have you got?
Crushed hopes, confusion, anxiety and mild irritation.
Unless you meant in the game. In which case : crushed hopes, confusion, anxiety and mild irritation.
Plus a "disagreement on strategy" and "disagreement on opinion" which, in my view, mask a disagreement on objectives. But I also needed to verify an additional element which, apparently, I was wrong about. Nevermind.
Atlo: So I searched ''Hallmark'' and clicked on the first link. I was greeted by a man in a bright sweater with a christmas hat grinning at me.
Still, he did nat hit her he did nat (oh hallmark).
Aaanyway.
I could conceive that some random player (especially a beginner) could underestimate the importance of, uh, determining an affiliation in a game about determining affiliations. But when it goes beyond that, it's scumwork. Like a wagon, driven by a locomotive, either on the forum and/or in the scumchat. The very point and complexity of forum mafia (and, okay, collective life in general) is how "accidental" and "deliberate" errors can be hard to tell apart. So I don't know who exactly plays pretend. But as I said, all the band that downplays the power role of self-certification is suspect to me, and if there are honest mistakes in it, I also think that it's where deliberately misleading people hide.
But now that we are today. A wagon forms on Scene. I'd have been fully on that yesterday, I now suffer from longterm frostburn syndrome, fearing that too scummy to be scummy isn't scummy enough, and that vocal players infight benefits shadow mafia. Which leads to an absurd position : if scumtell isn't scumtell then what is scumtell (the reason why I first suspected Cat of shielding/buddying with Frost with that rhetoric leading to an absolute gameplay deadend). I have to overcome it, I guess.
On Scene, I have old stuff. I have his position towards Frost, which I had found super scummy : he was so much protecting Frost and justifying Frost's over-interpretation of Joe's vote, and then he was even voting against me, judging that my read of Frost's interpretation as scummy was more scummy than Frost's interpretation... all with shifting goal posts (fist saying that I was reading too much into Frost's vote because it was obviously a non-serious joke and then that I was reading too much into Frost's vote because it was obviously a very serious honest mistake. So, I classified Scene as scum. But then, bam, Frost innocent. So... Scene was right ? But again, how, and how how much (my old theory that one had to know Frost's affiliation in order to not suspect him, theory nuanced by the, well, aforementioned longterm frostburn syndrom, already contracted by some current players from previous games with Frost). And, scumknowing, would he have diverted the wagon towards me to protect, that early, the crazy frost asset ? So... I'm not certain about this part anymore.
But then, today. The fight against mason reveal. It's an avalanche of dubious justification, that seem to shift with mafia opportunities (I briliantly described them in post 344, and by brilliantly I mean oh that would be SO badass if it all turned out true - and so cringe otherwise). I was also surprised by the sudden "don't harp on me because I'm just a noob so of course what I'm saying to absurd, also I 100% stand behind what I'm saying by the way" (post 291).
And, checking notes, the Frost end of wagon. As I had said, I'm suspicious of the late, weakly motivated comers to the frostwagon. Scene first saw Frost's erratic behavior not as scummy but as "probably town", and (post 170) "all over the place" then pre-hammered (219, L-2 to L-1). Again, can be some vaguely LAMIST participation to a mislynch, or a no lynch concern. But I have more trust for those who really saw Frost as scummy for a long time and voted for that.
So, that's the colorful story of SupplementScene. After Frost, I find it a tad too colorful (though it's a reflex that I reproached to day1 players as conductive to paradoxical scumtell inversions), and I'm more scared of players who stayed more dull and discrete (like Joe and his non-committal posts, or Dedo, who doesn't have a strong history of scuminess but could strongly illustrate mafia's mason-related "damage control" reaction, or... well, to be fair, my notes list 8 absolutely certain mafia players and 1 merely very probable one).
We thankully have a bit of time ahead. I need a couple of alternative re-reads.
Currently my most townie reads are csanjuro and catte but I have to re-check visibility bias. That is, we'd need stats on posting and especially on actual-content-posting.