This way he can switch back to micro at 1 second to deadline, and force the tie? Or hammer if the opportunity presents itself? If he believes he's caught scum, I can see that play making sense (even if I don't really believe it; mostly a hypothetical).

It's bad from a purely selfish point of view, but it would give a wagon to analyse and I really don't like yours and Trent's play in the last few minutes. Deliberately balancing the wagons strikes me as a deliberate attempt to cause chaos.

I've already unvoted but I'm still not happy with the situation at all.

No. I don't want a tie. You should be looking at the people who drove us to a tie.

Given the three viable wagons,

Carradice: will self-resolve on D2 any way (if left alive)
Micro: Reading Town.
SPF: Not sure, possible scum or Town.

I'm leaving my vote on SPF.

The 4th alternative is a conscious no-lynch by a tie, but I don't think that's a good idea in any way.

We'd have a certified scum pick for Day 2 if he did this.

Seriously, guys, think about the effor that SPF and Micro have been putting into the game. But Lift on Day 1?? What do you think?

Please make a decision if you're going for SPF or micro, so SPF can claim if you are intending to go for him, or so you can both vote for micro with plenty of time to spare?

There was no balancing of wagons, of the wagons I prefer you over Micro. How is that balancing when I vote for who I think is a better lynch do the two wagons?

What. Aleternative. Did. I. Have?

Vote the claimed Cop? Vote Micro whom I belive Town? Maybe start a 6th wagon or vote Peeves for the lulz? No, I'm not purposely voting for a tie, and I don't think trent was either.

The wagons were balanced and no lynch was in play

SPF screams town when he is the one who unbalances the wagons

We're in a situation where if SPF isn't town he can save himself to Day 2 by re-voting for Microfish or Caradice

I'd be okay with Lift, though prefer SPF.
Do we have the numbers for Lift?

You, me - need two more.
And I'll only do this if you'd prefer micro over SPF, so please make that choice explicit?

Sure, your D1 read of Micro has to be a sure thing, right? No choice but to vote for the distant third place wagon and balance it up with Micro.

Don't sit on your hands, pick one of us.

I'm NAI on Lift, like I am on SPF. Wouldn't like to do it for a player who's away, but compared to Micro and Carradice I'm ok.

Apparently I messed up, when I fixed the quotes. This disappeared.

6. Non-Town factions of two or more members have access to a 24/7 chat, running parallel to this thread.
That/Those Mafia Mason/s would be talking to themselves.
Unless, This Mafia/Town-Mason-Mix would be their own faction, which sound complicated. I'm trying to keep thigs simple.


This is so anti-town.

The only thing I could find is this: (but I only searched for cop results and only in game 64)
"About cops, why holding so much faith in a townie cop to solve our problems? Even if we do have one, he has not claimed and he cannot let us know openly. So, there is no substitute for us doing our work. "
post 623 in game64


But I have the niggeling feeling, that something like this happened before in a game I skimmed. Probably month ago though.


Where are we on vote count? Does everyone agree on no-lynch? If not I need to know now, I will be offline in a few minutes.

Actually, "effort" from SPF? Lift has been a shining example of coasting, but SPF has been giving nothing!

Do we really have two scum wagons?

Of course it's not. But if I have someone being say 70% Town and someone being 50%, I'd vote for the 50.