gogtrial34987: Bookwyrm posted that he didn't see them as a team, due to dedo's conviction that he'd caught flub. I, however, interpret that conviction as false. I think dedo was deliberately aiming for a wrong derpclear, based on making the same mistake with the way mechanics work as he'd made before.
This so called derp-clear wouldn't really clear me, though, would it? At most it would put distance between Flub and myself but that's about it. As for distancing, would such carefully planned play be worth it considering I've already had him as my top suspect from before along with Scene (and by process of elimination left as last top suspect)? He is still among my lynch choices. If we were scum together I was practically bussing him since halfway of Yesterday.
On top of that you seem to be giving me enough credit for coming up and trying to pull off to moderate success such a play while at the same time you are smacking me for making a number of mistakes out of not paying [enough] attention which mafia don't need to do as they know perfectly fine what they are supposed to do?
I have to be
Schrödinger's scum to be able to do that!
Also, this would be another point in general that I have to disagree with you (and others, I'm not sure if this came from you initially) on the notion that scum will be making mistakes by not paying enough attention. That may be true in some cases but a good scum will be as thorough if not more so than Town players exactly because they will be able to capitalize on poor Town play, whatever the reason for that is. That's why Yog and Wyrm and HSL (and probably others that don't come to mind in this instant) are so efficient as scum (and as Town, but the scum part is the point here) - because they pay that much attention and capitalize on it.
gogtrial34987: Now, I do read his explanation (
#927) as tonally pure, and that's making me hesitate a lot with scum-reading dedo because of this. I kinda hate the way rule 3 is phrased in combination with dedo's final paragraph here; if I conclude he's town because of this, then regardless of his actual alignment, it'll have felt not in the spirit of things, with some tinge of unfairness toward those who don't have dedo's alignment.
To be honest I don't want to be given Town credit on such matters (but not be deprived of it either). The whole point of rule 3 isn't that you are denied an extra weapon against scum who might be hiding behind it but common courtesy toward people in general. I don't think any of the players we still have here would try to abuse that rule for the sake of getting ahead in the game (I promise you I wouldn't ever. If I'm scum I'd rather try to twist something else or just take it but I won't come up with a cheap fake external reason for what I've been or haven't been doing in the game).
gogtrial34987: @Bookwyrm: If you're mafia, you've underestimated how certain I am of Pooka being town, and that's going to cost you dearly.
But if he's Town and Pooka is indeed mafia it will cost everyone Town dearly.
gogtrial34987: On the other hand, I see dedo agreeing a whole lot with Bookwyrm. I remember in particular how Joe was noting that his early town read of Bookwyrm was partly inspired by dedo townreading Bookwyrm (sadly Joe never answered me just how much of his own read was because of it). Maybe with SPF's loss, the Bookwyrm-dedo team decided to just live or die together. I have the easiest time seeing dedo as scum in the flub/dedo/Bookwyrm trio, and I could see him paired with either.
I am agreeing with him since most of what he has been saying makes sense to me and this has been going on for the better part of the game. At the same time I can't be both scum with Flub (from whom I allegedly tried to distance myself using with a convoluted play) and with Wyrm (with whom I'm apparently sticking till the bitter end). Why would I distance myself from mu scumbuddy flub but stick with my scumbuddy Wyrm?
Wyrm presented Pooka and Flub as the scum team and based on my own conclusions based on wagons and results so (and the a leap of faith in two cases) that is the scenario that makes the most sense to me.
I forgot this part:
gogtrial34987: ping 4: framing. This is how you win as scum (I've learned through happy experience). You drive the narrative while giving town a seemingly valid choice to pursue and argue about.
This is tricky as you are currently doing something very similar - you are bashing the only other player that has been giving (maybe not you, but still) general Town vibes. Everything depends on how you look at things and what you're trying to pull out. Even if you're wrong, if you're set to find fault in someone it's not that hard to do so.
Anyway, I still have Flub as my top pick from before. Pooka is basically the alternative choice by principle of elimination.
I don't want to vote for Wyrm as I believe it's a mistake. We need to hit scum twice but only screw up once. If everyone else feels otherwise I believe there are enough other players here to do it.
I think I had more stuff in my original post but I can't remember what it was. This one does looks a bit smaller but I believe I managed to recreate most of it.
Also, Flub has been awfully quite. I'd like to hear what he things of all of this.