It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
flubbucket: This whole post smells scummy.

So
Very
Scummy.

Vote: ZFR
avatar
Ixamyakxim: Normally I'd think so too but unless I'm a blind chicken with ADD he sort of breadcrumbed a role and hinted that he's a bit of a "big deal."

Plus if he is scum I don't get why he'd scream at the top of a steeple (did I spell that right?) that he voted to make sure he didn't get lynched. I almost want to slap a vote on you, but then I feel like YOU'RE too smart to not have known what he's doing. So maybe you're fishing too?

And am I the only one happy about Joe's flip after the non-claim? I mean I "assume" he was around to do it, but the wagon went fast at the end when we got close to end of day and I guess he could have missed his chance.
Have mercy.......


Unvote: ZFR


Vote: Ixamyakxim
avatar
muddysneakers: Fair. What are the scumtells Joe made?
avatar
flubbucket: Did I say Joe made any scumtells??
Not specifically that I recall, no. I figured I'd give you the benefit of the doubt that Joe did something you found scummy. So what reason did you have to vote Joe if he wasn't scummy to you? Care to let the rest of us in on the secret?
avatar
ZFR: @Lift, what are the deadlines for toDay?
avatar
Lifthrasil: It is now Day 2. All votes are reset and the Day will start with Phase 1 (normal voting) again. Which will last for about 3 days +/- half a day.
This was written yesterday afternoon. So that means the Phase will end some time on Thursday or Friday early morning. European time. Which translates to 'some time Thursday' in US-time(s).
avatar
bler144: Forget why you made the vote D1. Why make this post to start D2, rather than, like assess what to do next, or what your reads are now, yada etc.?
I wanted to first start my vote on SPF, and explain why.
avatar
flubbucket: Did I say Joe made any scumtells??
avatar
muddysneakers: Not specifically that I recall, no. I figured I'd give you the benefit of the doubt that Joe did something you found scummy. So what reason did you have to vote Joe if he wasn't scummy to you? Care to let the rest of us in on the secret?
Why would I ever originally Vote someone if I thought they weren't scummy?? Granted his posts later were somewhat less so, but as has been stated clearly it was a bit late in the Day to make a mad dash to another lynch.

My original assessment and Vote were based on his lack of bolding his Vote on supplementscene. JoeSapphire is no rookie, so why he did such a thing was odd.

He also didn't make an attempt to remedy his Vote in subsequent posts. That is until he changed his Vote.

He also mentions bler144 prominently in his posts, listing him first on the possible scum team, yet Votes SirPrimalform......which he lists as third on the possible scum team.

Hindsight being what it is I'm content with his lynch. I would much rather have lynched mafia, obviously, but vanilla town is the next best option.
avatar
muddysneakers: Agent comments on Joetells flub is reading but no one can or will identify what those tells are.
OK, I'm starting to feel like you're playing obtuse. I've pointed out exactly what I saw in JoeSapphire and I've pointed out what I thought flubbucket had seen.

avatar
agentcarr16: Hrm.

Heh.
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Elaborate?
1. I don't like how convenient this all was for P1na.

2. Again, this feels like a very Town play from flubbucket.

avatar
flubbucket: Hindsight being what it is I'm content with his lynch. I would much rather have lynched mafia, obviously, but vanilla town is the next best option.
Vanilla Town is a better lynch than Neutral?
avatar
agentcarr16: .......
Vanilla Town is a better lynch than Neutral?
Are there neutrals in this game?? I didn't know that.
Quick check in, I see the day is in progress. If all goes well I will be here in about 5 hours. If that doesn't work out, it will be later this evening.
I re-read Ix and then ZFR.

Need to pick up the pace tonight, but...

avatar
flubbucket: Hindsight being what it is I'm content with his lynch.
The game is likely to be a lot less entertaining though. The few people I might have suspected to be goofing more including myself all seem relatively serious for whatever reason(s).

avatar
Ixamyakxim: snip
avatar
flubbucket: Have mercy.......
Yeah. I had to sit on that one, given my history with him.


avatar
ZFR: I wanted to first start my vote on SPF, and explain why.
Ok. Fair enough.

But couldn't you have made the same case without the first paragraph and a half at least and it would have been infinitely less LAMIST, and then filled in details if questioned on them? It's not like you're referring to events that no one noticed or commented on when it happened, right?

(I'm a big advocate for brevity.)

1) Question for you after re-reading you - from your POV would you say you've been asking other players questions that are intended to help sort them?

2) What do you make of Ix D1 and D2? In making that read of him, had you played with/observed him before?

3) I haven't actually thought this question through, so pardon that it's rough, but assume SPF is maf. With Joe flipped town, does maf!spf suggest any connections?
The Day drags on. It is almost noon and still there is no new prime suspect found. Everyone eyes everyone else, full of mistrust. But no one knows who might be a witch. A few timid accusations are exchanged, but otherwise the incarcerated women are quiet. Just glancing out of the window from time to time at the inexorably progressing sun. At least it turned out to be a nice day outside.

------------------------------------------------------------

Daily vote count:


agent 1 - muddy (269)
Ixam 1 - flubb (301)
ZFR 1 - SirP (273)
flubb 1 - P1na (257)
SirP 1 - ZFR (258)

Not voting: agent, Ixam, HSL, bler, cristi
With 10 alive it takes 6 votes to lynch in Phase 1.
If you find any errors, please give them back!

------------------------------------------------------------
avatar
bler144: But couldn't you have made the same case without the first paragraph and a half at least and it would have been infinitely less LAMIST.
OK, fair enough. I wanted to contrast SPF's (honestly stupid) hypothesis for the reason for my vote-hopping with the real reason for my vote-hopping, but I suppose it did come as LAMIST.

avatar
bler144: (I'm a big advocate for brevity.)
k,fairenuf.

avatar
bler144: 1) Question for you after re-reading you - from your POV would you say you've been asking other players questions that are intended to help sort them?

2) What do you make of Ix D1 and D2? In making that read of him, had you played with/observed him before?

3) I haven't actually thought this question through, so pardon that it's rough, but assume SPF is maf. With Joe flipped town, does maf!spf suggest any connections?
1) I suppose, no. I made votes to observe readion to sort players but I don't think I've asked others direct questions.
Why did you ask me this? (I'm not being flippant; I'm seriously interested why you asked me if I asked questions).

2) That he posted very little and didn't stand out in any way at all. Really, when I made post 292 when listing the POE names for SPF's patners I had to look at the player list to see whom I was missing (Ixam).
(I never played with Ixam and he played very little in the last game I hosted, but again he didn't post much there).

3) Off the top of my head: no.
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Is town expected not to self-pres, and why?

And?
Sure, a certain amount of self preservation is expected but it sounded like ZFR was making excuses.

As for flub, I read his post as more of a general attempt to avoid last minute chaos. While the rules in this particular game mean that we avoid our usual EoD1 fiasco resulting in a no-lynch, it brings its own potential for chaos.

I still really read ZFR's reasoning as "anyone but me".

avatar
ZFR: Finished rereading.

OK, Town points for flub. I don't see you adding a second mafia vote on my wagon so early.
Interesting. While I can see how you'd think the two votes are unlikely to be MM, you don't think MT or even TT is remotely possible?

My vote is very much a continuation of the position I held yesterday, reinforced by our exchange today. But I suppose the same could be said of your vote for me.

Honestly, I don't see much changing from further interactions between us and I'm aware of my tendency to tunnel. With that in mind I'll leave my vote on you and look at other players.

avatar
Ixamyakxim: And am I the only one happy about Joe's flip after the non-claim? I mean I "assume" he was around to do it, but the wagon went fast at the end when we got close to end of day and I guess he could have missed his chance.
Aha, Ix! I was wondering why you plonked your vote on Joe 2 days before the deadline and then seemingly disappeared?


avatar
bler144: As for flub going at ZFR, I don't think he's responding to what ZFR did at the time, he's responding to ZFR's ex post facto framing of it. I don't see anything factually wrong with what ZFR said - my guess is it's something in the tone, or probably more likely the fact the ZFR felt a need to excuse himself by even bringing it up unprompted.
Actually, I'd say this is closer to my problem with ZFR than whatever you think I'm nuts for thinking. Perhaps I haven't been expressing myself well...

avatar
flubbucket: Have mercy.......


Unvote: ZFR


Vote: Ixamyakxim
Ok, interesting. Can you elaborate?

avatar
ZFR: OK, fair enough. I wanted to contrast SPF's (honestly stupid) hypothesis for the reason for my vote-hopping with the real reason for my vote-hopping, but I suppose it did come as LAMIST.
You sure went to a lot of effort to counter something that was stupid. I'm not sure why you felt so threatened. :P
EDIT:
Re 3) There is the connection I mentioned earlier. maf!SPF would suggest town flub, since I don't see SPF putting a second vote on top of fellow scum's first one.
avatar
ZFR: 2) That he posted very little and didn't stand out in any way at all.
There's not a lot going on. Actually, nobody really stands out much at all.

Makes me think we have 1) a really lurky group 2) a lot of mafia 3) a lot of power roles...

... but most probably a combination of all those things. Or everyone is just playing a reallly tight close to the vest sort of game.

Every time I've found "scum" stuff it's been so wine in front of me (muddy's No Lynch, your "I don't want to be lynched," flubb jumping on you for it) that I'm not convinced enough it's legit to do anything about it.

Someone asked "Why scene last night" - I think I'm starting to get why. He was drawing a ton of attention - now we're all just sort of staring at each other wondering what's going on.

I might revert to my tendency to LaL - lynch all lurkers - but it's going to be tough to figure out where to start ;)
avatar
Ixamyakxim: I might revert to my tendency to LaL - lynch all lurkers - but it's going to be tough to figure out where to start ;)
That's easy, don't vote for anyone right now and Lift will start you off when we get to phase 2!