It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
There are quite a lot of products tried to do what "snap" want to do, but they all failed.

I think "snap" will be limited only on Ubuntu based distros, or extend to Debian based distros.
Since "snap" do not work better than its (many) predecessors, I doubt it will success.
avatar
kbnrylaec: There are quite a lot of products tried to do what "snap" want to do, but they all failed.

I think "snap" will be limited only on Ubuntu based distros, or extend to Debian based distros.
Since "snap" do not work better than its (many) predecessors, I doubt it will success.
I looked at it. It seems that it's still very much command based.
avatar
Magmarock: I am very interested in how gog makes their Linux installers. They work exactly like .exe even to the point where you are asked where you want things to go. I wish more programs could be installed this way. I for one don't like using repositories to install programs.
Yes, the convenience is horrifying. Much better to have installers that bother me with shit that was figured out half a century ago. I just hate being able to say "man program", much nicer to hunt for docs. And don't forget how pesky it is when something you install is well-integrated - I mean, every app having access to an icon pack is much, much worse than configuring every application on the system to use it. Oh, how about knowing at all times what exactly you have installed and what are its dependencies? I can't breathe from the sheer terror. Oh, a lib that you have bundled with a hundred apps has just been discovered to have a fatal bug and now you have to update everything instead of just the lib? Hey, what's your time for if not busywork? :)
avatar
Magmarock: I am very interested in how gog makes their Linux installers. They work exactly like .exe even to the point where you are asked where you want things to go. I wish more programs could be installed this way. I for one don't like using repositories to install programs.
avatar
hyperagathon: Yes, the convenience is horrifying. Much better to have installers that bother me with shit that was figured out half a century ago. I just hate being able to say "man program", much nicer to hunt for docs. And don't forget how pesky it is when something you install is well-integrated - I mean, every app having access to an icon pack is much, much worse than configuring every application on the system to use it. Oh, how about knowing at all times what exactly you have installed and what are its dependencies? I can't breathe from the sheer terror. Oh, a lib that you have bundled with a hundred apps has just been discovered to have a fatal bug and now you have to update everything instead of just the lib? Hey, what's your time for if not busywork? :)
Do I detect a note of sarcasm through your text?
It's funny that today they call it "dependency management" if you just include all the crap in one huge blob of a binary.

It's crap either way, software and software distribution suck.