It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
None of you did it, so looks like I'm gonna have to do it for you.

This here thread is for all you lit nerds out there, to discuss books. This is not to just list books you've read, but rather to have an in-depth observation and analysis of them. To kick things off, I'll start with a classic and see if this goes anywhere:
Gulliver's Travels by Jonathan Swift
This is really a great book at the beginning, but in my opinion, diminishes in quality as it goes on. While a master of satire, there's a fine line between trying to make a change and just sounding bitter. Swift did well at the beginning, but struck pretty hard at the end with his attack on humanity in general. He makes valid points but handles them in a pretty rough and depressing way that feels more like a criticism than a call for change, which should be the goal of satire.
Any thoughts?
avatar
zeogold: None of you did it, so looks like I'm gonna have to do it for you.

This here thread is for all you lit nerds out there, to discuss books. This is not to just list books you've read, but rather to have an in-depth observation and analysis of them. To kick things off, I'll start with a classic and see if this goes anywhere:
Gulliver's Travels by Jonathan Swift
This is really a great book at the beginning, but in my opinion, diminishes in quality as it goes on. While a master of satire, there's a fine line between trying to make a change and just sounding bitter. Swift did well at the beginning, but struck pretty hard at the end with his attack on humanity in general. He makes valid points but handles them in a pretty rough and depressing way that feels more like a criticism than a call for change, which should be the goal of satire.
Any thoughts?
*ahem*

http://www.gog.com/forum/general/what_are_you_reading/page1/?search=reading
*ahem*
http://www.gog.com/forum/general/what_are_you_reading/post1677
avatar
zeogold: This is not to just list books you've read, but rather to have an in-depth observation and analysis of them
Post edited January 02, 2016 by zeogold
tinyE probably didn't *read* the OP. :)
avatar
zeogold: None of you did it, so looks like I'm gonna have to do it for you.

This here thread is for all you lit nerds out there, to discuss books. This is not to just list books you've read, but rather to have an in-depth observation and analysis of them. To kick things off, I'll start with a classic and see if this goes anywhere:
Gulliver's Travels by Jonathan Swift
This is really a great book at the beginning, but in my opinion, diminishes in quality as it goes on. While a master of satire, there's a fine line between trying to make a change and just sounding bitter. Swift did well at the beginning, but struck pretty hard at the end with his attack on humanity in general. He makes valid points but handles them in a pretty rough and depressing way that feels more like a criticism than a call for change, which should be the goal of satire.
Any thoughts?
I actually enjoyed the whole book a lot, though I admit the first two journeys are probably the best part of the book, clever and funny in equal measure. I think I enjoyed the third part (Laputa etc.) the least. I definately found it less memorable, than the others. The Houyhnhnms were maybe a tad to bitter, but that change in tone at least made it a very memorable part, and I think changing drives like that, from funny to more serious and angry helped drive some points home. That said, I'll admit I didn't really work hard to read to deeply into Swift's book as far as political issues etc. are concerned, and enjoyed it mostly in a somewhat similar way to The Adventures of Baron Munchhausen.
avatar
zeogold: None of you did it, so looks like I'm gonna have to do it for you.

This here thread is for all you lit nerds out there, to discuss books. This is not to just list books you've read, but rather to have an in-depth observation and analysis of them. To kick things off, I'll start with a classic and see if this goes anywhere:
Gulliver's Travels by Jonathan Swift
This is really a great book at the beginning, but in my opinion, diminishes in quality as it goes on. While a master of satire, there's a fine line between trying to make a change and just sounding bitter. Swift did well at the beginning, but struck pretty hard at the end with his attack on humanity in general. He makes valid points but handles them in a pretty rough and depressing way that feels more like a criticism than a call for change, which should be the goal of satire.
Any thoughts?
avatar
Breja: I actually enjoyed the whole book a lot, though I admit the first two journeys are probably the best part of the book, clever and funny in equal measure. I think I enjoyed the third part (Laputa etc.) the least. I definately found it less memorable, than the others. The Houyhnhnms were maybe a tad to bitter, but that change in tone at least made it a very memorable part, and I think changing drives like that, from funny to more serious and angry helped drive some points home. That said, I'll admit I didn't really work hard to read to deeply into Swift's book as far as political issues etc. are concerned, and enjoyed it mostly in a somewhat similar way to The Adventures of Baron Munchhausen.
Well, it's not so much reading into the political issues as being aware of what was going on at the time. The Voyage to Lilliput, for example, was showing that the political system in Britain was determined by nothing more than pompousness (the royalty in Lilliput were determined by the height of their heels), and Brobdingnag shows that British society was cruel and unforgiving to foreigners.
Hard to discuss more than one book in one linear forum, isn't it? I mean, this is going well for Lilliput, but if I bring up a new book but people also want to keep talking about Lilliput...

dogs and cats living together - mass hysteria!

You get the picture.
Robinson Crusoe by Daniel Defoe

This book is about a man who was stranded on an island with only one goal: survive.
To return to his city he must become someone else. He must become.. something else.

NOTE:This book is NOT about Oliver Queen.
Attachments:
rcdd.jpg (83 Kb)
avatar
amrit9037: NOTE:This book is NOT about Oliver Queen.
Ah:(
Post edited January 02, 2016 by Moonbeam
avatar
amrit9037: Robinson Crusoe by Daniel Defoe

This book is about a man who was stranded on an island with only one goal: survive.
To return to his city he must become someone else. He must become.. something else.

NOTE:This book is NOT about Oliver Queen.
I read that one not too long ago, and I found it quite interesting to see how radically the idea of traveling has changed in a few centuries. That said, it's a really over the top story.
This topic feels very similar to "Books finished in <year>" threads, to be honest.
avatar
InkPanther: This topic feels very similar to "Books finished in <year>" threads, to be honest.
I know, I've seen such threads, but the reason for this one is to analyze/discuss these books rather than just say "Here's a list of stuff I've read." Look at my response to tinyE thinking the same thing.
avatar
InkPanther: This topic feels very similar to "Books finished in <year>" threads, to be honest.
P to the InkPanther, you have failed this thread!!!
avatar
InkPanther: This topic feels very similar to "Books finished in <year>" threads, to be honest.
avatar
zeogold: I know, I've seen such threads, but the reason for this one is to analyze/discuss these books rather than just say "Here's a list of stuff I've read." Look at my response to tinyE thinking the same thing.
Actually there is a fair bit of a longer posts and reviews, and some spark a bit of discussion. But these threads aren't very active and It may be difficult to create even smaller niche. On the other hand, nobody has created "books finished in 2016" topic yet... ;)

avatar
InkPanther: This topic feels very similar to "Books finished in <year>" threads, to be honest.
avatar
amrit9037: P to the InkPanther, you have failed this thread!!!
*Holds sign*
No pink in ink!
.


(@GOG, notifications are broken. *cough* Again...)
Post edited January 02, 2016 by InkPanther
avatar
misteryo: Hard to discuss more than one book in one linear forum, isn't it? I mean, this is going well for Lilliput, but if I bring up a new book but people also want to keep talking about Lilliput...

dogs and cats living together - mass hysteria!

You get the picture.
Pretty much that. Can't really have a book club with in depth discussions unless everybody participating is reading the same book at roughly the same time, otherwise it'll be quite messy. Still, could make for a few good posts about each.

I'm not one for classics though.