Posted August 04, 2017
Devil May Cry 2 HD (360)
Everyone says number 2 is the weakest and in this is one time I agree with everyone- well compared to number 1 that I've played so far. To pinpoint the main weakness it's the combat, or more accurately the enemies. DmC 2 tends to throw large amounts of easier canon fodder enemies at you instead of lesser numbers of harder enemies. Basically you can win through most fights by holding down the gun shooting button! Also the bosses were a pushover, every single one of them. Keeping in mind here that I've only played the normal mode so far, hard mode may be different.
Overall though, it's not a terrible game- just not as good as the first one.
Even more than DmC 1, the story makes no sense. But it doesn't bother me in brawlers. Unlike 1, DmC 2 consists of one medium campaign where you play as Dante and one shorter campaign where you play as some random chick called Lucia. Though their paths cross at various points in the story. If anyone has played the Ada missions for Resident Evil 4, this is a similar. Dante is more about guns, whilst Lucia felt stronger in melee. You can play their stories in either order.
One thing I have to mention about these HD versions is the graphics. They look similar to taking an early '00 PC game like Gothic and playing it on a modern PC at high resolution. Simple textures and models, but everything is razor sharp and clear. It's actually a look I really like. CAPCOM gets a lot of criticism for all their HD remakes, but I like the way they do them. If you have the originals (PS2 in this case) and are happy with them, then you miss nothing by not buying these as the gameplay is identical. But if, like me, you're starting on the series then the HD remakes are the versions to go with and are the same experience just with sharper graphics.
Everyone says number 2 is the weakest and in this is one time I agree with everyone- well compared to number 1 that I've played so far. To pinpoint the main weakness it's the combat, or more accurately the enemies. DmC 2 tends to throw large amounts of easier canon fodder enemies at you instead of lesser numbers of harder enemies. Basically you can win through most fights by holding down the gun shooting button! Also the bosses were a pushover, every single one of them. Keeping in mind here that I've only played the normal mode so far, hard mode may be different.
Overall though, it's not a terrible game- just not as good as the first one.
Even more than DmC 1, the story makes no sense. But it doesn't bother me in brawlers. Unlike 1, DmC 2 consists of one medium campaign where you play as Dante and one shorter campaign where you play as some random chick called Lucia. Though their paths cross at various points in the story. If anyone has played the Ada missions for Resident Evil 4, this is a similar. Dante is more about guns, whilst Lucia felt stronger in melee. You can play their stories in either order.
One thing I have to mention about these HD versions is the graphics. They look similar to taking an early '00 PC game like Gothic and playing it on a modern PC at high resolution. Simple textures and models, but everything is razor sharp and clear. It's actually a look I really like. CAPCOM gets a lot of criticism for all their HD remakes, but I like the way they do them. If you have the originals (PS2 in this case) and are happy with them, then you miss nothing by not buying these as the gameplay is identical. But if, like me, you're starting on the series then the HD remakes are the versions to go with and are the same experience just with sharper graphics.
Post edited August 04, 2017 by CMOT70