Themken: This is kind of what I have been saying too: Galaxy should still carry the beta tag as a warning that it is rather unstable and problematic.
While I do think Galaxy came out of beta to early (I think 1.2 was the real start of beta), it really doesn't matter honestly. That's the nature of services like Galaxy and Steam that are under constant development. You are always going to run the risk of creating more issues. Even Steam has quite a few issues in it's "stable" build.
Having said that, I do feel Galaxy is much more stable today then it has been in the past. You can't really judge complaints on the forum as some kind of messure of how stable Galaxy is. A certain amount of people will always have issues due to various reasons. But I use it nearly eveyday with minor issues.
MaximumBunny: Galaxy was not made for users and convenience. It was made because the management team wanted to say "we have something" to game publishers. Once you realize that, and that all the programmers are trying to do is not get fired rather than innovate and create, then you'll understand why it's always broken and will never work.
Must explain why the site is so broken too then... shit logic is shit logic to put it bluntly. It's quite clear GOG's goal isn't so much to innovate right now as it is to lay down the framework for what people expect in a gaming client and it's not done but it has come a long way in a short time. Galaxy get's more support than nearly anything else on GOG and is constantly updated (nearly every week or two).
