It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
yogsloth: Do stuff.
avatar
JMich: Allow me to point you towards post 337. I'm not going to do stuff as you said until I get a clarification (which I've already asked).
RW was pretty clear. You're in.
avatar
HypersomniacLive: Also no reply to my other question to you? Nicely done.
I dont see why you are talking about drealmer at all. Why are you not letting him deal with the questions and shade himself. You just seem to be bring dreamler up alot and you seem really bothered that trent has his vote on him, you go even far enough to try to break it down so trent sees your way and might remove his vote. I have no problem with you question anyone what get me is you backing up someone so hard and you are so bothered about a vote on drealmer.

*I am just getting on today and starting where I left off. I will be adding anything else to one post when I finish catching up.**
avatar
JMich: Allow me to point you towards post 337. I'm not going to do stuff as you said until I get a clarification (which I've already asked).
avatar
yogsloth: RW was pretty clear. You're in.
You mean post 473? Love your reading comprehension.
Still waiting for the clarification. Don't let that stop you from shooting someone though.
JMICH

avatar
RWarehall: At this point, Gamma is no more. I've heard nothing and it's been 3 weekdays, which doesn't earn a free pass. If JMich will sub, I may extend the deadline to Friday night if he thinks he can catch up in time, otherwise, Gamma will just die as if he was lynched or NK'd.
YOU'RE POSTING IN THE THREAD

THAT MEANS YOU AGREED TO SUB

WHICH MEANS THE DEADLINE IS EXTENDED SO YOU CAN CATCH UP
avatar
yogsloth: JMICH

avatar
RWarehall: At this point, Gamma is no more. I've heard nothing and it's been 3 weekdays, which doesn't earn a free pass. If JMich will sub, I may extend the deadline to Friday night if he thinks he can catch up in time, otherwise, Gamma will just die as if he was lynched or NK'd.
avatar
yogsloth: YOU'RE POSTING IN THE THREAD

THAT MEANS YOU AGREED TO SUB

WHICH MEANS THE DEADLINE IS EXTENDED SO YOU CAN CATCH UP
Ah, the "yell when you have no arguments" defense. Always works a treat.
Yes, I agreed to sub. Yes, I do post in this thread to say I'm catching up. No, I don't know if what the mod posted as a timeline for the sub still stands. Until he tells me otherwise, I stand by that.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJHJHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
avatar
yogsloth: AAAAAAAAAAAAAJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJHJHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
I believe the phrase you're looking for is "GRAAAAAAH!!!!!"
avatar
yogsloth: AAAAAAAAAAAAAJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJHJHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
have a hit! *pass*

vote for lift~ shoot doc if you have to, leave JMich alive that is a bad shot to shoot, I'm pretty sure gamma was unable to get to the computer and it is completely NAI - would be dick to shoot JMich after he reads all the shet too!
That too.
avatar
yogsloth: ...
Better idea if we don't lynch Hijack or drealmer, shoot one of them.
"That too" meaning the scream, not the medicine for my glaucoma.

avatar
trentonlf: Better idea if we don't lynch Hijack or drealmer, shoot one of them.
Yeah, this ain't American Bandstand and I ain't taking requests.
avatar
JMich: I believe the phrase you're looking for is "GRAAAAAAH!!!!!"
You are superdead.
avatar
JMich: I believe the phrase you're looking for is "GRAAAAAAH!!!!!"
avatar
dedoporno: You are superdead.
SuperDead - coming to theaters soon - superhero ZOMBIES
avatar
Lifthrasil: (perhaps because you are not sure yet, what exactly to claim)
avatar
HijacK: Amusing. Is this bit supposed to taunt me? Just inquiring for better transparency.
Actually yes.

Other than that it fits that you don't want to do a full claim. I think I know what you hinted at, but no point in discussing that.

Meanwhile its late and I am dead tired. So I'm gonna make use of the extended deadline and read the rest of the posts tomorrow.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: [...] A hint that maybe you knew more about Bler's alignment than a generic townie would know. Could be scum, could be PR, and interesting regardless. Or could just be me interpreting your word choice as you being emphatic than you actually mean to be. [...]
And what does this have to do with me misreading the format of drealmer7's day-kill?


avatar
Bookwyrm627: [...] There are more players than you, Lift, and Drealmer in the game, and some of those players might have an investigation. So maybe scum!you does want to draw an investigation to use as evidence that you are town. My godfather example was a direct counter to the idea that "scum!HSL woudn't want to draw an investigation"; anything beyond what I was directly countering is beyond the purpose and scope of my example. [...]
This is supposed to be an answer to my follow-up question to you? OK.


avatar
Bookwyrm627: The mod probably set things up to force town to look at how and what people are saying, not simply fall back on role claims to solve the game.[...]
I thought we were supposed to do this in every game...



avatar
bler144: I'm just going to kick us along here. This is, btw, not an argument for or against lynching him but the Road Captain is responsible for making sure other riders stay safe. [...]

Let's assume, for the sake of argument, he's soft claiming bodyguard. Do you still want to lynch the miller or not given that he's indicating his role is to die, albeit at night? For one, I mostly believe him. For two, lynching bodyguards has not generally served us well. [...]
Thanks for the clarification. Bodyguard crossed my mind when he said the "close to the boss" bit, but the Road Captain didn't mean anything to me in relation to that.

Did I say I want to lynch either of the Miller(s)? I said I'm not sure I buy his claim. Still mulling over it. yogsloth's too, to be honest.

I'm a tad too lazy to go back and look for the exact post, but I seem to remember that you said at some point that you'd be willing to vote for Bookwyrm627. Could you elaborate a bit as to what for?



avatar
drealmer7: [...] 3 days ago makes something irrelevant completely? still felt worth commenting on, and I still feel like it was, he's a good scumlean for me [...]
Why is he a good scumlean again?


avatar
drealmer7: [...] She could be scum [...]
What makes her scummy enough for you to want to wagon her?


avatar
drealmer7: [...] you also had me incorrect multiple times thinking I like L-2 claims when I DO NOT. Only L-1 claims for me, just in case you forgot again.[...]
avatar
drealmer7: bler, seriously, I correct you every time, and I think each time I correct you I am unsure if you see it because you don't respond to it - go back and look please, never ever ever L-2 claims for me - grrrrrrrrrrrr [...].
I'm pretty sure that bler144 has this correct. I can recall a discussion that JMich was in arguing against L-2 claims, and you arguing the opposite. Not particularly inclined at the moment to go find which game that was in, but am pretty sure my memory doesn't fail me on this.


avatar
drealmer7: [...] HSL and I seeing eye to eye on a few things - not sure how this sits with me in the long run but I'm liking it so far, maybe we've had a breakthrough? [...]
I'm actually starting to get worried here.



avatar
yogsloth: I did. Somewhere back there.
I can't seem to find it from a quick skim of your ISO. When you have some time, please point me into the right direction.



avatar
Sage103082: I dont see why you are talking about drealmer at all. Why are you not letting him deal with the questions and shade himself. You just seem to be bring dreamler up alot and you seem really bothered that trent has his vote on him, you go even far enough to try to break it down so trent sees your way and might remove his vote. I have no problem with you question anyone what get me is you backing up someone so hard and you are so bothered about a vote on drealmer.[...]
It's interesting you claim to have no problem with me questioning anyone, yet took a pretty sudden and persistent interest in my questioning trentonlf about his own actions and behaviour, to the extent that you butt in to his defence and try to shift the attention away from him and on to me, going as far as to say that I tried to make trentonlf remove his vote from drealmer7 to throw shade at me.

I'm pretty sure it hasn't escaped your attention, but let's take another look at the attempt to "break it down so trent sees my way and might remove his vote" that you accuse me. trentonlf switched to HijacK due to not believing the latter's claim in his post #361; that was according to GOG's timestamps 2ds ago. My questioning him didn't start until quite later in post #427; that was according to GOG's timestamps about 22hrs ago. So tell me, how exactly did this work again?

Would you perhaps like to spin something in relation to HijacK's time of claim and my questioning trentonlf?

I'm pretty sure that your reading comprehension skills are not that bad that you don't see what I am questioning trentonlf about. I also don't have you as the type to point FoS at others for the sole reason of them not sharing your view. So, I'm inclined to think that something else is going on here.