Posted February 01, 2016
Have a 1 TB WD External hard drive which has been faultless for several years now (about 4 or 5). Isn't produced anymore, but the follow up 2 TB model is just about in your price range.
Picked up a 5 TB Toshiba Canvio about two months back which is fine - so far. Picked Toshiba that time as I'd got one reduced a good bit, and the 2 TB version of that series is in your budget.
Western Digital, Segate and Toshiba all seem about equal on failure rates, give or take, going by Backblaze's reports.
The Toshiba takes a bit longer to wake up from slumber under Linux (can't comment on other OS performance). Not too bothersome, really, as it is a backup drive and nothing else in my case. Works fine when it is awake.
Hitachi seem to have the lowest failure rate - but you do pay extra for them. That said by and large failure rates of all of them are fairly low and Backblaze server setup really taxes all of their hard-drives quite heavily; so it ought to be less of a problem with consumer level use, even. But that said, of course, data redundancy and backing up on more than one drive decreases chance of critical data loss.
I back up important stuff across several hard drives now [also still have a really old 250 gb in a custom enclosure sitting on the desk].
Picked up a 5 TB Toshiba Canvio about two months back which is fine - so far. Picked Toshiba that time as I'd got one reduced a good bit, and the 2 TB version of that series is in your budget.
Western Digital, Segate and Toshiba all seem about equal on failure rates, give or take, going by Backblaze's reports.
The Toshiba takes a bit longer to wake up from slumber under Linux (can't comment on other OS performance). Not too bothersome, really, as it is a backup drive and nothing else in my case. Works fine when it is awake.
Hitachi seem to have the lowest failure rate - but you do pay extra for them. That said by and large failure rates of all of them are fairly low and Backblaze server setup really taxes all of their hard-drives quite heavily; so it ought to be less of a problem with consumer level use, even. But that said, of course, data redundancy and backing up on more than one drive decreases chance of critical data loss.
I back up important stuff across several hard drives now [also still have a really old 250 gb in a custom enclosure sitting on the desk].
Post edited February 01, 2016 by Mnemon