jamyskis: Several problems with your assertion by association with that "meme":
1. The more precise definition of bigotry is stubbornness regarding an exclusionary philosophy targeted against a group defined by its state of being (racism, sexism, homophobia, antisemitism, Islamophobia). It does not normally encompass political views. If it did, anyone who opposed National Socialism so vehemently would be, by that definition, a bigot. You see the inherent problems.
2. The loudest individual is not necessarily the bigot. A bigot could sit there and feign the moral high ground by calmly and prattling off conspiracy theories about Jews, Muslims and feminists. That doesn't make one less of a bigot, but rather simply a more talented debater.
3. Bradley hasn't been simply debating the concept of "redefining marriage" or any such equivalents in terms of racial, religious or sexual orientation debate. He has, on several occasions, called for the death and persecution of individuals solely on the basis of their sexual orientation or religion. Trying to portray him as a victim of some "anti-bigotry bigotry" by implying that his views have somehow been misunderstood is disingenuous at best, and I honestly expected better from you.
You forgot to mention transphobia, which the user in question has engaged in.