GlorFindel: I started boycotting on my own months before Time4Tea's thread; back in April of 2020. after forced Galaxy 2.0 update.
I didn't start any thread about that or wrote a "goodbye" note to GOG, as I didn't think anything would change regardless; and I was right.
This thread is possibly only reason I still come to GOG and read these forums, with a few other honorable mentions.
Not that I think anything will change with of without this or similar threads, mind you.
And I have more than 700 games on GOG and if GOG hasn't lost its way and made me abandon it; I would probably, by today, have more than 1000 games on GOG, with many being double dips, but sadly that will never happen.
rjbuffchix: Nice. Yes, as pointed out earlier, it seems to me that many of the people boycotting or even who are just unhappy with "Nu-GOG" are ones with extensive libraries. Essentially, "whales" to use the modern term. It seems to me like every company these days would like to have whales, so GOG's decisions are especially baffling.
Not to sound too belittling of people's consumer choices, but it seems to me that instead of retaining and expanding the current type of whales they have, GOG would like to instead abandon them and court "dumber whales" who will merrily accept DRM in the form of client requirmenets, online requirements, etc as "that's just the way things are".
Honestly, that is where the lack of critical thinking seems to be concentrated, what with all the "what is GOG supposed to dewwwww, not accept the DRMed game?" "it's just how the game is desiiiiigned" et al ad infinitum.
Yes, you could say that! I was a GOG "whale" and I preached about GOG to all my friends and family; many of which became GOG members because of me and gifts that I bought them on GOG.
I bought many games here as doubles, after years of owning them elsewhere (mostly Steam).
I accept DRM as a fact and live with it, hence I use many other stores/clients (Steam, Origin, uPlay/Ubisoft Connect and Battle.net); not EGS, mind you and never will.
But, GOG-s DRM-free and clientless gaming with offline installers was an idea, an ideal and sort of "religion" even; that's why GOG-s changing and abandoning that "true, old" and unique values is so hurtful, unacceptable and unforgivable.
And, one last thing: GOG will never replace "old" GOG whales who bought games here (even at full price) just because they are here, regardless of previous ownership, with new "dumber" whales as you said, because GOG offers nothing that would attract the "No Steam, no buy" or similar whales. It's simply lacking in every way, comparing with e.g. Steam.
DRM-free, clientless and offline installers were only things which set GOG apart and elevated it above the rest of the market, but these values were being; either abandoned (like clientless GOG for years now), poorly (and probably deliberately) maintained (like offline installers) and diluted (like DRM-free).