It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Thanks for all the feedback you gave us after the previous update. You’re awesome and it shows the GOG insights piques your interest. Today’s article is about a topic that we know is very important to you – our commitment to DRM-free gaming and what it exactly means.

GOG was built on trust, which is at the very core of our identity. It is evidenced by our 30-day refund policy or releasing games DRM-free, among other things. At the same time, we understand DRM-free might mean different things to different people, especially when modern games blend offline and online experiences.

When GOG first launched, the gaming market looked very different from what it is now – retail was the main place to buy games, and digital distribution was just taking baby steps. DRM, the copy protection software created to protect licenses against unauthorized disc copying, was a huge source of annoyance for gamers often restricting how they can access their content. From the beginning, part of GOG’s mission was to provide gamers with a simple way to access and play games, without the need to fiddle with files or deal with any DRM. Making sure you can play games purchased on GOG offline, make backup copies, and install them as many times as you need is even more relevant now, as things like game preservation become an important topic for the whole industry.

Today, while some of the most infamous DRMs of the past are thankfully long gone, it doesn’t mean the constraints are fully gone. They just have a different, more complex face.

Games are evolving and many titles offer features beyond single-player offline gameplay, like multiplayer, achievements, vanities, rewards. Many such games are already on GOG and will continue to join our catalog. But it also raises the question: is this a new frontier for DRM?

And this is the crux of the matter. Some think it is, some don’t. Some hate it, some don’t mind it. And to be fair, we didn’t comment on it ourselves for quite some time and feel this is the time to do so:

We believe you should have freedom of choice and the right to decide how you use, enjoy, and keep the games you bought. It manifests in three points:
1. The single-player mode has to be accessible offline.

2. Games you bought and downloaded can never be taken from you or altered against your will.

3. The GOG GALAXY client is and will remain optional for accessing single-player offline mode.


We fully commit to all those points. Aside from this, we reaffirm our continuous effort to make games compatible with future OSs and available for you for years to come.

As for multiplayer, achievements, and all that jazz – games with those features belong on GOG. Having said that, we believe that you have the right to make an informed choice about the content that you choose to enjoy and we won’t tell you how and where you can access or store your games. To make it easier to discover titles that include features like multiplayer, unlockable cosmetics, timed events, or user-generated content, we’re adding information about such functionalities on product pages. In short, you’ll always know.

We always took a lot of pride in the freedom we provide gamers. While we know DRM-free may have a different meaning to everyone, we believe you have the right to decide how you use, enjoy, and keep the titles you get on GOG. With games evolving towards adding more online features, we want you to understand our DRM-free approach and what it means to us. It is an important topic – let us know what you think.
low rated
If a game can't be fully downloaded and played offline then it shouldn't be on GOG. Simple as.

I don't want to read fine print and search for forum posts. Being on GOG should be enough. Like a seal of quality. That's why I buy my games here. Because I don't want to google what is and isn't available offline.
low rated
avatar
Sheershaw: None of those things are DRM. They're problems, but they are not DRM.

Also, while I am aware of some games employing telemetry, I've never heard of a game purchased outside of the Microsoft store preventing you from manipulating your files,.
"DRM not allowing you to meddle with game files. Not a problem."
Specifically, that is DRM.
low rated
GoG offline installers are such a maddening mess that fails 80% of the time that it feels like you are trying to crack DRM. This is why I do not buy anything from GoG anymore; the DRM free line isn't the reality if you cannot obtain it thanks to GoG ensuring they provide the most broken downloads in the history of the internet.
low rated
avatar
charlemagne1980: GoG offline installers are such a maddening mess that fails 80% of the time that it feels like you are trying to crack DRM. This is why I do not buy anything from GoG anymore; the DRM free line isn't the reality if you cannot obtain it thanks to GoG ensuring they provide the most broken downloads in the history of the internet.
well, I'm seriously disappointed these are single threaded, but I don't think any of them ever failed for me, just worked much slower than it could, which obviously is less than ideal and makes use of backups more annoying
low rated
avatar
chandra: We understand DRM-free might mean different things to different people, and even this thread shows how many different opinions are there. Some comments we see here, state that the article doesn’t bring anything new – and that was our intention. We don’t want to introduce new policies, we want to reaffirm our commitment to DRM-free games and want you to understand what it means for us.
Claiming GOG is "reaffirming it's commitment to DRM-free games" at the same time it's welcoming more games with DRM, only serves to reaffirm that GOG is shifty and dishonest. It's like reaffirming your wedding vows while you're cheating on your spouse.

Do those words taste like a greasy coin as they roll off your tongue, chandra?
Post edited June 13, 2022 by richlind33
low rated
avatar
chandra: We understand DRM-free might mean different things to different people, and even this thread shows how many different opinions are there. Some comments we see here, state that the article doesn’t bring anything new – and that was our intention. We don’t want to introduce new policies, we want to reaffirm our commitment to DRM-free games and want you to understand what it means for us.
avatar
richlind33: Claiming GOG is "reaffirming it's commitment to DRM-free games" at the same time it's welcoming more games with DRM, only serves to reaffirm that GOG is shifty and dishonest. It's like reaffirming your wedding vows while you're cheating on your spouse.

Do those words taste like a greasy coin as they roll off your tongue, chandra?
Sorry but can let this pass. You are free to disagree with gog and the expressed. But insulted a staff member his no. A minimum of respect must be in order.
low rated
avatar
richlind33: Claiming GOG is "reaffirming it's commitment to DRM-free games" at the same time it's welcoming more games with DRM, only serves to reaffirm that GOG is shifty and dishonest. It's like reaffirming your wedding vows while you're cheating on your spouse.

Do those words taste like a greasy coin as they roll off your tongue, chandra?
avatar
Lukin86: Sorry but can let this pass. You are free to disagree with gog and the expressed. But insulted a staff member his no. A minimum of respect must be in order.
That was my maximum, given the circumstances.
low rated
avatar
richlind33: Do those words taste like a greasy coin as they roll off your tongue, chandra?
oh brother.

basically agree with what Lukin86 said.
Post edited June 14, 2022 by tfishell
low rated
avatar
richlind33: Do those words taste like a greasy coin as they roll off your tongue, chandra?
avatar
tfishell: oh brother.

basically agree with what Lukin86 said.
It's disgusting that they claim they're "reaffirming their commitment to DRM-free games" when the reality is they're bringing in more games that blur the line between DRM and DRM-free. If you don't have a problem with being lied to, maybe you should ask yourself why.
low rated
avatar
tfishell: oh brother.

basically agree with what Lukin86 said.
avatar
richlind33: It's disgusting that they claim they're "reaffirming their commitment to DRM-free games" when the reality is they're bringing in more games that blur the line between DRM and DRM-free. If you don't have a problem with being lied to, maybe you should ask yourself why.
It's not a problem to lie or not. It's a matter of conduct, a matter of decency. Even if the staff lied, they never insulted you. As I said you are free to disagree with the politics of gog and the voice. But don't insult the gog staff members.
low rated
avatar
richlind33: It's disgusting that they claim they're "reaffirming their commitment to DRM-free games" when the reality is they're bringing in more games that blur the line between DRM and DRM-free. If you don't have a problem with being lied to, maybe you should ask yourself why.
avatar
Lukin86: It's not a problem to lie or not. It's a matter of conduct, a matter of decency. Even if the staff lied, they never insulted you. As I said you are free to disagree with the politics of gog and the voice. But don't insult the gog staff members.
Lying IS a matter of conduct. Horrible conduct. And it's extremely disrespectful and insulting -- at least to those who have the intelligence to recognize sophistry.
low rated
I am late to this one but make sure future game do not include certificate shit or such things that "can run out of time". We do not want plays best before games! Get ready for a shit storm once servers are down after a few years. Make sure we pc player have control over the multiplayer as much as possible.
Say those publishers/developers they should integrate such online multiplayer stuff that make user hosted servers possible and that make users independent from them.

thanks
Can we have an official answer to:

I'm quite concerned about GOG's nature of DRM. For example,

If I have installed a game on my personal PC and then let my toddler play it or watch me play it, is it OK?

Or can we play it together?

I'm not talking about installing the game on his PC or sharing it with people. I'm just asking if it's OK for my toddler or wife to play the game on my PC.

Is it against GOG's ToS?


I'd like a moderator to respond if possible, please!
Post edited September 26, 2022 by Beelzebub.Devotee
It was all a lie...
avatar
SmollestLight: The in-game items received in Cyberpunk 2077 are purely cosmetic and in no way affect the single player experience of the game.
avatar
fronzelneekburm: This steadfast refusal to remove the Galaxy DRM for that cosmetic nonsense really flies right in the face of all those fancy words. This is your sister company's game - don't they think (or do they not care) that gating content behind Galaxy is kinda hurting the gog brand? What's the cost/benefit ratio here? Do they think attracting a handful of cretins that go "Hurr durr, must install Galaxy so I get teh free t-shirt!" is actually worth alienating the hardcore DRM-free crowd for, which gog has tried its damndest to attract over the years?

Apparently, they're adament to keep the Galaxy requirement - it's quite baffling, really.
Well, well, well... :D

Not only have they steadfastly held onto their bullshit DRM-lite scheme for Cyberjunk, they are now implementing it for games that came out 7 years ago. It probably wouldn't even bother me as much if it weren't for the fact that this basically is their own game. But CDPR's titles have always been at the forefront of eroding gog's supposed/former values, so recent developments come as no surprise.

I said it before: Words are cheap...