Radiance1979: [userbenchmark]
Phasmid: Anything relying on userbenchmark can be safely disregarded. Utterly useless site. Even if you're Intel only it's still utterly useless, since they were still recommending the 9600k after 10000 series released. And the awful value 8350k before that.
dtgreene: Has AMD come out, or is AMD planning on coming out, with a CPU that can compete in this sector, or are Intel and ARM going to be the only reasonable choices here for the foreseeable future?
Phasmid: How low power do you want? Van Gogh will go as low as ~7W as an APU, though I wouldn't expect them any time soon given the supply squeeze at TSMC.
Financially Atom and Celeron were almost completely pointless for Intel, and would likely be even more so for AMD.
Well, i won't say utterly useless, the predictions in gains percentage wise felt pretty accurate overall. both on the cpu front as well as gpu. I did read the recommendation to go for the 9600k instead as the better value for money choice and to be honest that statement did seem backed by reviewers in general cases. The addition of extra cores seems only really applicable in the case of larger open world games.... and maybe people looking for extreme fps but in that case you where probably already looking at minimal 7's and up, at least in my world ;-)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------
the complete read-out btw
Intel’s tenth gen, six-core i5-10600K is one of the fastest consumer CPUs currently available. Out of the box, its maximum all core frequency is 4.5 GHz, but a simple overclock allows all 12 threads to hit 5.0 GHz. Although a new Z490 (LGA1200) motherboard is required, Intel have indicated that LGA1200 will remain compatible with Rocket Lake CPUs which are due later this year. The eight-core Ryzen 3700X currently competes in the 10600K’s price bracket. CPU based encoding is akin to using hair clippers on a lawn but If dedicated hardware such as NVENC or QuickSync is not an option, the 3700X can outperform the 10600K in encoding workloads such as UserBenchmark 64-core, Cinebench, Blender-CPU and Handbrake-CPU. Meanwhile, the 10600K is better for almost everything else. Currently, the real problem with the 10600K, and much of the Comet Lake line up, is availability. Whilst there was a paper launch in Q2 2020, at the time of writing, the 10600K is still largely unavailable for purchase. In order to achieve better value for money, without compromising on gaming performance, it is necessary to consider the older generation 9600K which is 26% cheaper and offers similar gaming performance. [Jun '20 CPUPro]