It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
There doesn't have to be outright thrashing for the negatives to be all too clear which is all that is needed
because we all know what we don't want a game to be like.
avatar
Galadian1800: I asked why this game is not available here, not why you are not able to give intelligent answers.
so you invalidated your own no comment rule i see
well that buggers it the game aint coming here

and we got you to thank for it
avatar
Daniel_M: Sorry I have linked the wrong one. Will post them shortly.

EDIT:
Here is one but it's in German
http://www.gamersglobal.de/test/the-abc-murders

Here is another one in French
http://www.jeuxvideo-live.com/jeux-video/test-agatha-christie-the-abc-murders-1097
avatar
Galadian1800: Ok. This test seems to be hard at reality and the regard of the test is not good. I thought by myself that this game will not be one of the games which makes you brainstorming, but it seems it will be just a better hidden object.
maybe you should re evaluate your second post
because the tortured syntax in that makes no sense what so ever and then you have the nerve to complain that others are not able to give intelligent awnsers

hubris and all that

btw this is gog if you expect a straight awnser ...well lurk moar
Post edited February 04, 2016 by snowkatt
avatar
Galadian1800: I asked why this game is not available here, not why you are not able to give intelligent answers.
avatar
snowkatt: so you invalidated your own no comment rule i see
well that buggers it the game aint coming here

and we got you to thank for it
My english is not the best and my "no comment" was just a replacement for the required text under the topic cause my topic says all what to say.
So I see no reason for an answer like that you gave to me.
There is no problem to give a senseful answer or to give NO answer. Better than a stupid answer.
Post edited February 04, 2016 by Galadian1800
avatar
Galadian1800: My english is not the best and my "no comment" was just a replacement for the required text under the topic cause my topic says all what to say.
So I see no reason for an answer like that you gave to me.
There is no problem to give a senseful answer or to give NO answer. Better than a stupid answer.
It was a joke, calm down, like snowkatt said it how things work around here. I'm waiting for another lost soul to post a problem about The Witcher 3 so that i can use my map... Now that i think about it, i no longer have it, dammit.

Edit: And to make it clear, the staff will not discuss why the game wasn't released here, so you'll only get answers from the community... that doesn't know the answer.
Post edited February 04, 2016 by Cyraxpt
avatar
Daniel_M: There doesn't have to be outright thrashing for the negatives to be all too clear which is all that is needed
because we all know what we don't want a game to be like.
That's true. The reviews were very clear that there were many things they liked about the game, and some they didn't. They were a long way from "this game is completely awful", though, which the one-star review for the mistaken link to the Nintendo DS game pretty much did say about that older game.

It's fine to not like the direction the game designers took, decide that wasn't what you wanted to play, and get your money back on a preorder, but that's different from a buggy, unplayable game.

I expected to get pretty much what the reviews described---a slightly more casual game---based on the previews and developers involved, and that's fine for me, too.
avatar
snowkatt: so you invalidated your own no comment rule i see
well that buggers it the game aint coming here

and we got you to thank for it
avatar
Galadian1800: My english is not the best and my "no comment" was just a replacement for the required text under the topic cause my topic says all what to say.
So I see no reason for an answer like that you gave to me.
There is no problem to give a senseful answer or to give NO answer. Better than a stupid answer.
Well, I mean, she wasn't wrong.
Patience is a virtue, young grasshopper.
Clamoring angrily at the developers and the store is not.
And neither is putting your little sister's hairbrush in the blender on high speed, but you didn't hear that part from me.
avatar
Daniel_M: There doesn't have to be outright thrashing for the negatives to be all too clear which is all that is needed
because we all know what we don't want a game to be like.
avatar
Luned: That's true. The reviews were very clear that there were many things they liked about the game, and some they didn't. They were a long way from "this game is completely awful", though, which the one-star review for the mistaken link to the Nintendo DS game pretty much did say about that older game.

It's fine to not like the direction the game designers took, decide that wasn't what you wanted to play, and get your money back on a preorder, but that's different from a buggy, unplayable game.

I expected to get pretty much what the reviews described---a slightly more casual game---based on the previews and developers involved, and that's fine for me, too.
Oh the German review for example was harsh, the author even (rightly) ridicules Poirot's exultation about having realised obvious things (he even mentions a scene with only 3 objects all of which had to be found).

BUT of course almost all hinges on your expectations (partly on what was promised too, or I wouldn't have pre-ordered). I don't want to bash the game, if people buy it and enjoy it, great for them, but it's sad for us others who had reason to expect something else.
Post edited February 04, 2016 by Daniel_M
Its out now
Post edited February 04, 2016 by Galadian1800