It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Which is better and why?

Discuss!
I like whole side turns. The other option gets frustrating in bigger battles when you have to constantly wait, play, wait, play, wait, play and so on.
Going to have to agree with Tarm, I don't want any more barriers put in my way whilst I am trying to get into range to shoot the enemy let alone whilst I am shooting them. Just seems kind of aggravating to me, similarly in the Age of Wonders series I always play with Classic mode as opposed to Simultaneous.
avatar
rhemorigher: Going to have to agree with Tarm, I don't want any more barriers put in my way whilst I am trying to get into range to shoot the enemy let alone whilst I am shooting them. Just seems kind of aggravating to me, similarly in the Age of Wonders series I always play with Classic mode as opposed to Simultaneous.
Simultaneous should always be a toggable feature in "turn based " games! It's a good feature when playing coop and multiplayer but oh so very annoying in singleplayer against the AI. Classic modes AKA real turnbased is totally fine for me because I can wait for my turn. Experience tells me I'm in the minority there though so if you want to play multiplayer of any kind simultaneous seems to be a necessary evil.

End rant. :)
I was wondering about the problem of one-sideness of side turns, but then I remembered that there is reaction fire.