Posted April 19, 2024
Anyone has any opinion on the new show ?
Timothy Cain liked it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5D_C0gNjaiw
---
I have to say I only watched the first episode until the "nuclear explosion".
Then I went all wtf and stopped. This would have been a very poor depiction even for a *conventional* explosion, let alone a nuclear one.
This is even far below the standard that many Hollywood movies have set in this regard. Even for a series thats not supposed to be realistic this is just amazingly bad.
"The Terminator" and "Terminator II: Judgement Day" had quite decent depictions of how a nuclear explosion would actually look like. Though later instances of the franchise also have been incredibly laughable, though. Like you have a nuclear explosion basically next door but all that happends is your windows break and the building shakes a bit lolz.
I really dont get it. You can get recordings of actual nuclear explosions on YouTube just fine. Its easily obtainable public knowledge.
First element of any nuclear explosion is an absolutely blinding flash of light, even if you are very far from the explosion. Young peoples eyesight usually recovers, older people dont have this luck. Then there is what is called a fireball - the air gets heated up so much by the xrays from the explosion that it glows (4000 degree Celsius on the outer line of that fireball). Then there is the shockwave, which leaves behind a vaccum, then the air comes back with a vengeance.
So why do Hollywood movies usually depict nuclear explosions so poorly ?!?
Timothy Cain liked it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5D_C0gNjaiw
---
I have to say I only watched the first episode until the "nuclear explosion".
Then I went all wtf and stopped. This would have been a very poor depiction even for a *conventional* explosion, let alone a nuclear one.
This is even far below the standard that many Hollywood movies have set in this regard. Even for a series thats not supposed to be realistic this is just amazingly bad.
"The Terminator" and "Terminator II: Judgement Day" had quite decent depictions of how a nuclear explosion would actually look like. Though later instances of the franchise also have been incredibly laughable, though. Like you have a nuclear explosion basically next door but all that happends is your windows break and the building shakes a bit lolz.
I really dont get it. You can get recordings of actual nuclear explosions on YouTube just fine. Its easily obtainable public knowledge.
First element of any nuclear explosion is an absolutely blinding flash of light, even if you are very far from the explosion. Young peoples eyesight usually recovers, older people dont have this luck. Then there is what is called a fireball - the air gets heated up so much by the xrays from the explosion that it glows (4000 degree Celsius on the outer line of that fireball). Then there is the shockwave, which leaves behind a vaccum, then the air comes back with a vengeance.
So why do Hollywood movies usually depict nuclear explosions so poorly ?!?