Posted December 30, 2020
Hey all,
I only tried Empire Earth once at a friend's place as a teenager (over a decade ago), and at the time it seemed appealing. A few years ago, I made up my mind when considering getting into this series: based on the info I gathered from the Web, I decided to get Empire Earth II and Empire Earth II - The Art of Supremacy, and NOT Empire Earth + expansion. I have had no regrets.
That said, I am generally interested in RTS scenario design (both history-based and fictional). I like to play the scenarios and campaigns of various RTS games - they provide ideas for my own modding efforts.
Now I wonder if I should play the campaigns in the original Empire Earth?
It isn't exactly news that Empire Earth has badly aged: the graphics is one thing, but what really sucks is the AI and personally I can't stand the idea of all civilisations looking the same (vaguely Western aesthetic).
Still, while it cannot compete with Empire Earth II, I figured maybe the campaigns in Empire Earth (and its expansion) still manage to heave themselves up to the level of the campaigns in Age of Empires II (speaking of the original Age of Kings)? From a mission design perspective I mean. I say AoEII because there isn't a chance in hell that the Empire Earth scenarios can rival those in Empire Earth II (again, from a mission design perspective - having played both, I can say AoEII is good but not as advanced as EEII). I am not overly interested in the cheesy implementation of in-game cinematics - which from what I've seen on Youtube really do elevate the camp to new levels, not what I expect from a (mostly) history-based game - but am asking specifically about the gameplay vs AoEII scenarios.
If the Empire Earth scenarios are less well designed gameplay-wise than those in AoEII, then I won't bother.
Thank you for any insights!
I only tried Empire Earth once at a friend's place as a teenager (over a decade ago), and at the time it seemed appealing. A few years ago, I made up my mind when considering getting into this series: based on the info I gathered from the Web, I decided to get Empire Earth II and Empire Earth II - The Art of Supremacy, and NOT Empire Earth + expansion. I have had no regrets.
That said, I am generally interested in RTS scenario design (both history-based and fictional). I like to play the scenarios and campaigns of various RTS games - they provide ideas for my own modding efforts.
Now I wonder if I should play the campaigns in the original Empire Earth?
It isn't exactly news that Empire Earth has badly aged: the graphics is one thing, but what really sucks is the AI and personally I can't stand the idea of all civilisations looking the same (vaguely Western aesthetic).
Still, while it cannot compete with Empire Earth II, I figured maybe the campaigns in Empire Earth (and its expansion) still manage to heave themselves up to the level of the campaigns in Age of Empires II (speaking of the original Age of Kings)? From a mission design perspective I mean. I say AoEII because there isn't a chance in hell that the Empire Earth scenarios can rival those in Empire Earth II (again, from a mission design perspective - having played both, I can say AoEII is good but not as advanced as EEII). I am not overly interested in the cheesy implementation of in-game cinematics - which from what I've seen on Youtube really do elevate the camp to new levels, not what I expect from a (mostly) history-based game - but am asking specifically about the gameplay vs AoEII scenarios.
If the Empire Earth scenarios are less well designed gameplay-wise than those in AoEII, then I won't bother.
Thank you for any insights!