Hey! :D

I played through this whole game and finished it. Pretty crazy, right? I have screenshots and achievements as evidence. You now have the rare opportunity to talk to someone who actually played the game so they can tell you all about it.

So don't be shy and Ask Me Anything :D

Well since you did the real work, my question is the same as in the review bombing thread.

Since your stance is that only verified users should be able to vote on a game and I certainly understand the merit of that argument, this game has a 4.7/5 or 9.4/10 which would make it one of the best games ever made.
There were counter arguments like having it on a different platform or pirated, I'd say even watching a play through could give someone a pretty good insight on a game.
Not mentioning that the verified purchases don't even need to play the game once for their score to add up...

My question was does this game really deserve that score?

"I pirated the game" and "A youtuber told me" are completely irrelevant. Reasonable stores don't let you review a product if you haven't bought it in that store because it means you have no experience with the product, and particularly no verifiable experience. The point of it is user experience from people who have the product.

Does the game "deserve" a high score? Sure, why not. I liked the game :D

Sorry, but this is even less informative then "I pirated the game" or "a youtuber told me".
You also didn't address the people who maybe got codes or reviewed it without even playing.
If you think it deserves it's score kudos for you (it's on par with the Witcher 3 Complete as an example), but on that merit I really wouldn't look to you for any game suggestions.

What is supposed to be informative about the fact that stores not allowing "reviews" from people who never owned that product at that store? A review published with gameplay time addresses the big "concern" of yours. Steam has that. It's also perfectly fine for two completely unrelated and incomparable games to have a high score, the score of one game is not dependent on the score of some other game. It's also not dependent on whether you specificially would look for game suggestions or not, that's not relevant to anything at all. Besides, you seem to already have people telling you what to think about videogames and what uhh.. "rating" to demand.

Steam has also been bought off to censor critisism too; that's why gog is picking up the gaming slack since epic is dropping the ball again.
And your ad hominem is richly ironic given you couldn't even go into any detail about why the game 'deserves' a high rating. How about comparing it to something more noticable, such as concord cyberpunk77 & baldur's gate 3?

damn, steam was "bought off"? :D
I wasn't asked about any details, I was asked a yes/no question, sry. As for comparing the game to something unrelated, I probably won't compare it to something unrelated, regardless of your richly ironic ad eminem :D

But there is something you can do to make things right. You can go to steam and write some spicy review to stick it to the bought off steam and whoever you hate. Feel free, I believe in you, you can do it :D