I really think that DX 2 threw away what didn't work in DX 1, and implemented thing that actually worked.

DX 1 was good at first, but only got worse as I progressed. It was repetitive, and the story which ruthless fanboys praise like their sucked up jesus was actually a story about this cyborg guy stopping a cliched guy who wants to dominate the world!!!!

Please clarify why you guys think that DX 2 is a terrible game. I can see that for DX 1 fanboys DX 2 might 'seem' like a disappointing sequel, but let's face it. It had better 'Choice & Consequence' implementation, it didn't make you are superman with augmented bulletproof BS and stuff, better characters, deeper storyline, and non-linear play style which changes depending on how you wish to play it.


Now don't tell me that I'm a troll of some sort, cuz if I was a troll, then I would not write my reasons like that.

0/10 Troll harder.

i thought the game was great too. your not alone. as to weather or not your a troll, i'd have to consult the Gods of gaming:

they're not in right now.


but no your not a troll.

I actually liked IW's faction system. It was pretty good considering the game came out like 7 years before Fallout New Vegas which improved it.

Also, universal ammo did not bother me too much because I play my Deus Ex games like stealth games instead of shooters, so I don't use much ammo anyway.

What I WAS disappointed with was the level design. The levels felt claustrophobic and less fun to explore than the original game's. I think Deus Ex 1 had some of the best level design of any first-person game this side of Thief, but Invisible War failed to follow suit in my opinion.

I give the first game five stars, the second game four stars, and Human Revolution 4 1/2 stars.

I'd give your trolling about a 4 out of 10

The second game was enjoyable, but the first gamewas an epic. The second was a bit more of a console toy; smaller levels, simplified interface.

Had a great time with both though.