JakobFel: I agree entirely with this. Obviously, those who literally can't run the game SHOULD be entitled to refunds. The problem I have are the morons who act like they have the right to exercise poor personal finance skills and buy a game just so they can refund it if they don't like it. That is top-tier entitlement right there. I know that I absolutely would not offer refunds to anyone unless they legitimately can't run the game. I love CDPR but the fact that they've offered these refunds just fuels the pathetic entitlement of gamers these days.

jocaguz18: No. The exact opposite. If you buy a game (any game) and you dont like it. You 100% should be able to return it. This goes to all products. That is how our laws works for a reason. It keep business honest.

JakobFel: No, refunds are meant for a product that is broken or otherwise dysfunctional. This means that you are completely unable to use said product. For example, if the game doesn't run on your system at all. You shouldn't be allowed to get your money back just because you didn't like the game. That has nothing to do with keeping business honest. If anything, it severely harms smaller studios who do their best to work with what they have to deliver a great product. This is particularly true of CDPR who, while they definitely did make mistakes, did not deserve even a fraction of the whining they received.

FTSO: The Consumer Rights Act says goods must be:
- Satisfactory quality.
- Fit for purpose.
- As described.

This is not a free to play with a internal market to pay his "work in progess", it is a Triple A, part of an industry of "legends" that plan to rise his products to $70 very soon, pushing more online services.

I know CDPR is not a internet provider, but considering the recent 500+ fixes, to see consumers with constant problems, since december, is quite complicated, especially after how it was promoted... compromissed with quality, next level, etc. Even the CEO helped with the mess, by post something that was not true, making the practice of refund absolutely fair.

Well, if you crossed 100 hours, please, keep it.

JakobFel: Just because something is a law, that doesn't automatically make it right. There are plenty of laws that need to be changed or modified. The main issue with that one is that "Satisfactory quality" is 100% subjective. What you consider satisfactory quality may be completely different from what I consider satisfactory quality. The other two are a nonissue as the game fits both of those.

FTSO: stop dodge the law applyinace and look at the product without so much "passion", you are ignoring all the company mistakes, they are not innocent.

But, any player close to 100 hours should to keep the game, quite absurd to refund only the bones.

JakobFel: I never said they were innocent but they certainly didn't make any mistakes that warranted the amount and toxicity of the backlash they received. People created an unrealistic image of CDPR after The Witcher 3, thinking they could do no wrong. Meanwhile, I came in skeptical of them at first, slowly growing to love them over time but my image of them was realistic. Plus, I guess part of it may be the fact that I also love Bethesda, so I guess I'm used to bugs but nonetheless, gamers really just need to get over themselves. Yes, we deserve to be treated fairly. No, we don't have a right to demand refunds if a game isn't the way we wanted it to be, to send death threats or infect devs with ransomware because a game didn't live up to our expectations.

CDPR is still the most consumer-friendly company in the industry right now, at least among the triple-A market. Larian would be a close second but they're still considerably indie. People take things for granted so easily. You may wake up one day and realize that the industry has run out of all of its CDPRs thanks to the way gamers treat them and it'd be 100% their own fault.

FTSO: Sit and watching the industry changing, indeed, have fun.

VisualBlack: You're just angry act the fact that CDPR hands over you an unfinished game but not realizing they can send updates by fixing the game? hilarious for a person who is still living in the days where physical copies are still a thing.

Whereaminow25: First of all, If you want a Refund, you were a weak gamer ...

waltc: Problem is, without corporations there would be no computers, no consoles, and no games or other kinds of software. Nada--zippo. At any price.

Some companies put out good products some put out bad ones, and fortunately the ones that put out bad ones generally don't last very long. Just be glad you have the products to choose from in the first place.

CP2077 is so controversial precisely because it's (imo) a crummy game put out by software developers with a reputation for putting out the wonderful Witcher games over many years. No one expected them to deliver a bug fest like CP2077 after Witcher 3. Going further than that, Night City is such a nasty sleaze fest that I personally didn't want to be there--even if the bugs were fixed. The daily news is enough like a hellhole such that when I game I don't want to escape to a sleaze pit full of nasty, dirty, rotten people living nasty, dirty lives inside nasty & dirty Night City. But, what do I know? Maybe most gamers today like sleaze...I don't know. And I particularly loathe rap music in all its forms. Ugh. It's no wonder Witcher didn't also feature rap music...;) (Imagine Geralt as a sleazy gang-banger pushing dope, with a boom-box blaring rap strapped to Roach's saddle...;) )

Anyway...people bought into the hype because of the Witcher games and CDPR has burned up a lot of Good Will it had created in the global gaming market when it decided to peddle something like CP2077. Had CDPR not been the developer for CP2077 it would have come and gone with barely a whimper, and few would even remember it.

I have no complaints about the game and I don't want a refund because after the demo and the trailers I saw I found I could not summon any desire to buy the game. So I didn't buy it. With every day that passes I know it was a good decision and I have no hope that this game will ever be changed enough to make me want to play it enough to buy it.

I don't see a future for CDPR if they do nothing for the next few years except try to fix this game. Working on Witcher 4 in earnest will help drive the memory of this abomination from the public mind--but even then--CDPR will have to work twice as hard to convince people to buy their next game--whether it's a Witcher game or not--all because of CP2077. It's rare when you see corporations make this kind of mistake because most who do don't recover. CDPR used to be my all-time favorite developer.

waltc: Night City is such a nasty sleaze fest that I personally didn't want to be there--even if the bugs were fixed. The daily news is enough like a hellhole such that when I game I don't want to escape to a sleaze pit full of nasty, dirty, rotten people living nasty, dirty lives inside nasty & dirty Night City. But, what do I know? Maybe most gamers today like sleaze...I don't know. And I particularly loathe rap music in all its forms. Ugh. It's no wonder Witcher didn't also feature rap music...;) (Imagine Geralt as a sleazy gang-banger pushing dope, with a boom-box blaring rap strapped to Roach's saddle...;) )