I guess i don't really have a "problem" with Cryostasis being on GOG....but GOG does imply "Good OLD Games"... and yes, i know, Witcher 2 obviously isn't old, it's newer then Cryostasis, but that's the owners of GOG's game, i understand that, so my question simply is this: what is the requirements for a game to be called a "Good OLD Game"?

At least 3 years old was what was originally considered OLD. However, GOG will be getting into newer material this year.

Give it enough time, and any game will eventually be "old". If GOG wants to get a head-start, that's fine with me. I personally don't care how old or new the game is. If it's DRM-free, and I'm interested in it, I'll buy it. If it's a game I'm not interested in, I am perfectly capable of ignoring it. More selection = good in my book. Keep 'em coming, I say.

Most of the games I've purchased here are games I already own the disk versions for, but gladly paid to have a DRM-free version that I could burn to disk and archive safely inside my original box.

GOG have already stated that they will begin moving into just being a general digital distribution site instead of being geared towards exclusively OLD games. They will likely still do both but it's not longer the sites sole interest.

This game is decent. It was worth getting.

Never mind old, what about good? The game has the worst performance of any PC game I've ever known.