Weclock: What's so boring about it?
Also, Uwe Boll used the 2nd one for the most part from what I can tell.
That was actually a pretty funny movie tbh, but let's get back on topic, about the game. Please go more in depth, because it seems like you're simply hating on a game that you haven't played, maybe you looked at the screenshots first, but that's it.

antihippie: On the contrary, I bought Postal when it came out and finished with it long before it appeared on GOG. Your completely baseless assertions coupled with the fact that you can laugh at the jokes in a Uwe Boll movie demonstrate that your absolute lack of credibility.

Weclock: your inability to post facts, and your obvious proof of not having played the game recently proves that you're an idiot for writing shitty reviews.
What kind of review is this? did you address the music for it's time? the graphics for it's time? the feel of different weapons?
You just said a bunch of subjective crap and gave it one star. I'm fine if you feel it was only worth one star, or less, that's fine, but write in detail about what you thought was bad about it. I am considering buying this game, but all of these reviews are just subjective personal opinion reviews!!

antihippie: Who cares about the weapons or the music, when the game itself is crap? Commenting on the music or the weapons (different feel, what a joke) when the game-play itself is tiresome and boring would be a ludacrous waste of time. You're just grasping at straws now. It's getting sad, like watching a man drown. A particularly incoherent and raging man but still.
The core game play is garbage, thus there is no need to go into the music (which is also crap btw). Let me draw you an analogy for your argument: Imagine going to a restaurant and getting served a log of human feces. There it is steaming on your plate, with a carrot flower and a side of mashed potatoes. Naturally, you send it back, and begin warning everyone to get out before they end up with salmonella or worse. Suddenly, out comes the waiter screaming at you for sending it back because, after all the garnish on the side was particularly good. Your rabid fanboyism is getting to the point where you should probably seek professional help.
As for reviews, of course they're subjective genius. All reviews are the informed opinion of the reviewer. Mine happens to be based on actually playing the game, and my desire to warn other unsuspecting individuals off from a similar fate. Your problem isn't with reviews, it's with anyone that speaks ill about this crapheap of a game, which for whatever sick reason you seemed to have affixed your star to. I only hope that once you're medicated properly, you'll be able to understand that.

antihippie: You've never played the game? Unbelievable. What the hell are you doing here? You're wasting everyone's time. You have absolutely no clue what you're talking about, and yet you're criticizing my review. You've never heard the music, yet you've criticized me for not reviewing it. Tell me something, when you're mucking out stalls at the local university, or whatever passes for work for you, do you walk into professor's offices and tell them how they're all wrong on the books they've written. "Oh I know absolutely nothing about particle physics, but that monograph you wrote was absolute bollocks."
That's the end of this thread then. It's over, you've admitted you know absolutely nothing, and you're basic problem is that you think I'm a big meanie. Sorry, I can't help the fact that my mean language hurt your little ears. I suggest that you get off the internet and back into your hug-box, so that you never have to read anything negative again.

sheepdragon: Sorry for the bump, but... I lol'd.
I love reading crap like this.
Anyways, I agree with Weclock on this subject. A proper review should go in depth, properly explaining why or why not something is good or bad or whatever, instead of posting inane rantings and analogies without giving something to tie them to.
If you can't to that, then just use the vote button instead.

antihippie: So not only did you not play the game that you're tirelessly defending, you clearly do not read either. Your posts are like a shining banner of idiocy mounted high atop a towering monument to retards. As for the ears comment, I'm sorry if simple turns of phrase are too literal for you. I've heard that's a problem for mental defects, so I'll try to be more strait-forward. Now, to clarify: as I've said, again and again, there is no point in an in-depth review to a game that has no redeeming qualities what-so-ever. It would be like discussing the aesthetics of roadkill. Therefore, to write a paragraph or two about the music for example, would be a waste of space when the entire point of my review was to warn people not to even bother with the purchase. As for your claims that I've violated the rules of civility, let's review the facts shall we? It's as easy as dragging a scroll bar.
I posted my review. You responded in the forum to said review claiming, among other things, that I had not played the game, a baseless assertion made clear by my review. When I explained I had in fact both purchased and played the game, you then insulted both my intelligence and yours with an utterly puerile response calling me an idiot. The fact that I continue to post is merely to watch you humiliate yourself in text repeatedly. Your tireless crusade to one-up me on an internet forum, in defense of a game you know nothing about is worth the price of admission. Oh crap, I did it again: OK, when I say that, I'm not saying that we just bought tickets at a movie theater...
Simply starring a game on this site is demonstrably ineffective, as any vote is diluted overtime, therefore I felt the need to post a review of it. As for explaining why something is good or bad, I suggest you re-read the original review. I summed up the game with as much text as the gameplay itself merited. Postal is a simple game and can be summed up simply: Varies screens, featuring an isometric hero killing people with various weapons, broken up by twisted loading splashes with forced attempts at twisted poetry and humor. You have weapons, you have people to kill...and that's it. I fail to see how that could warrant a two page review.

Weclock: Because I am bored of this, I will now say, that I was hoping you would come back and defend your review, not because I actually gave a damn, but because I wanted to piss you off and waste your time. :D This thread demonstrates your slant for this review perfectly.