Jesus Christ, stop overcomplicating things based on semantic deturpations of what people are trying to say! You haven't been answering absolutely *anything*, just avoiding the questions by giving semi-elaborate excuses and talking about how you like the game and how great it is.
All BananaJane is trying to see is
how the freaking game was supposed to look when nothing wrong with it is happening, i.e. no wobbly-wheels, no corrupt AI, no bugs, no color glitches. I didn't play the game when it was originally released, on the hardware and operative systems of its time, when I assume it would have ran flawlessly, the way it was meant to be. From what I understand, that's what BananaJane is asking for.
The fact is that this game is bugged as hell. I don't regret buying it, but even with the launcher I never know what kind of bug or glitch I'll encounter during my playthroughs. Also, the launcher worked perfectly with my older AMD machine with an ATI GPU, but I encountered major issues when trying to run it on my Intel with nVidia GPU and on my AMD with AMD GPU. It's not an exact science and, yes, those early races are easy
when your game is behaving the way it was supposed to. You're coming across as a pretentious douche who likes to brag about how "über l33t pro" they are at video games, and that BananaJane is a "n00b" who can't even win the early races, when the truth is this game is utterly unplayable on some systems, and even when running it on more compatible ones is never a sure thing.
I don't know if the video link you provided us with showcases the game running flawlessly, the way it was meant to run when it came out, years ago. I highly doubt BananaJane wanted to compare the different rendering or whatever modes of the game, they only wanted a way to compare how the game is running now on their computer to it running *flawlessly*, the way it was meant to be running.
Hope this clarified things.